Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 63–81 | Cite as

Mass, matter, and energy. A relativistic approach

  • Eftichios Bitsakis
Part IV. Invited Papers Dedicated To John Stewart Bell
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

The debate concerning the relations between matter and motion has the same age as philosophy itself. In modern times this problem was transformed into the one concerning the relations between mass and energy. Newton identified mass with matter. Classical thermodynamics brought this conception to its logical conclusion, establishing an ontic dichotomy between mass-matter and energy. On the basis of this pre-relativistic conception, Einstein's famous equation has been interpreted as a relation of equivalence between mass-matter and energy. Nevertheless, if we reject this epistemologically illegitimate identification, it is possible to elaborate a unitary conception of matter, which at the same time is an argument for the unity between matter and motion. In particular, the classical antithesis between matter and field becomes obsolete in the frame of the proposed interpretation.

Keywords

Relativistic Approach Modern Time Logical Conclusion Classical Thermodynamic Unitary Conception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and notes

  1. 1.
    J. S. Bell, inThe Physicist's Conception of Nature, J. Mehra, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. S. Bell, “Beables for quantum field theory,” Preprint, CERN-TH.4035, p. 84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Heisenberg,Physics and Philosophy (George Allen & Unwin, London 1958), p. 160.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Heisenberg, inNiels Bohr and the Development of Physics, W. Pauli ed. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1953).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See H. Diels and W. Kranz,Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (Weidmannische Verlag-Buchhandlung, 1965).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid. See also Y. Battistini,Trois contemporains (Gallimard, Paris, 1965), pp. 90–94. Also Aristotle,Metaphysics I, 5, 986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    For the ontology of Plato, see his Dialogues:Timaeus, Theaetetus, andParmenides.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    See Aristotle,Physics, Id.,Metaphysics.Google Scholar
  9. 9. (1)
    For a general treatment of early Greek philosophy, see the classical books: G. S. Kirk and J. E. Raven,The Presocratic Philosophers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1957);Google Scholar
  10. 9. (2)
    J. Burnet,Early Greek Philosophy (A. and C. Black, London, 1975). For a critical review of the conceptions about nature in ancient Greek philosophy, see E. Bitsakis,Scientia 109, 664 (1974).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    See R. Descartes,Principes de la Philosophie (Vrin, Paris, 1971), Part 2.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Ibid. SeeGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    A. Mercier, H.-J. Treder, and W. Yourgrau,On General Relativity (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    I. Newton,Opticks (Dover, New York, 1952), p. 400.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    I. Newton,Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1947),Definitions andScholium.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    Ibid., Defs. I and II.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Ibid., Def. III.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    I. Newton,Opticks, op. cit. ( p. 401.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    See S. Carnot,Reflections of the Motive Power of Fire (Dover, New York, 1960).Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    See Chr. Huygens,Treatise on Light (Dover, New York, 1962). This treatise was written in 1670. The preface of the first edition was written in 1690.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    A. Einstein, Préface, in I. Newton,Opticks, op. cit. (Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    A. Einstein,Ideas and Opinions (Crown, New York, 1982), pp. 348, 351.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    E. Mach,The Science of Mechanics (Open Court, Evanston, Illinois, 1960).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    Ibid., p. 237.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    E. Mach,The Analysis of Sensations (Dover, New York, 1959), p. 331.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    A. Einstein, in A. Einsteinet al., The Principle of Relativity (Dover, New York, 1923), p. 7.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    A. Einstein,La théorie de la relativité restreinte et générale (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1978), pp. 51–52.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    A. Einstein,Ideas and Opinions, op. cit., ( p. 337.Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    A. Einstein, in: A. Einsteinet al., The Principle of Relativity, op. cit., ( p. 148.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    W. Heisenberg,Physics and Philosophy, op. cit., ( p. 67.Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    P. Teilhard de Chardin,Le Phénomène Humain (Seuil, Paris, 1962), p. 268.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    For the relations between the actual and the potential in microphysics, see E. Bitsakis,Scientia 117, 539 (1982).Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    For the status of the philosophical propositions, see E. Bitsakis inFilosophia e Storia in Italia nel Novecento, F. Minazzi and L. Zauzi, eds. (Milano, 1987). The principle of indestructibility of matter was for the first time formulated by Democritus.Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    See A. Einstein, “Autobiographical Notes,” inAlbert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Open Court, Evanston, Illinois, 1951).Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    See Y. P. Terletski,Paradoxes in Relativity (Plenum, New York, 1968), pp. 60–61.Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    A. Einstein, in A. Einsteinet al., The Principle of Relativity, op. cit., ( pp. 143 and 149.Google Scholar
  37. 36. (1)
    For a detailed descussion of the preceding questions, see: E. Bitsakis,Le Problème du Déterminisme en Physique, Thèse d'État, Paris, 1976;Google Scholar
  38. 36. (2)
    Y. P. Terletski,Paradoxes in Relativity, op. cit. (.Google Scholar
  39. 37.
    See, e.g., J. P. Terletski,Paradoxes in Relativity, op. cit. Google Scholar
  40. 38.
    See A. Papapetrou,Lectures on General Relativity (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974), p. 55.Google Scholar
  41. 39.
    E. Einstein,La théorie de la relativité restreinte et générale, op. cit., p. 72.Google Scholar
  42. 40.
    A. Mercieret al., On General Relativity, op. cit., ( pp. 84–85.Google Scholar
  43. 41.
    A. Einstein, in A. Einsteinet al., The Principle of Relativity, op. cit., ( p. 99.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eftichios Bitsakis
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of IoanninaGreece
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations