Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 1–23 | Cite as

EPR and Bell's theorem: A critical review

  • Henry P. Stapp
Part IV. Invited Papers Dedicated To John Stewart Bell

Abstract

The argument of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen is reviewed with attention to logical structure and character of assumptions. Bohr's reply is discussed. Bell's contribution is formulated without use of hidden variables, and efforts to equate hidden variables to realism are critically examined. An alternative derivation of nonlocality that makes no use of hidden variables, microrealism, counterfactual definiteness, or any other assumption alien to orthodox quantum thinking is described in detail, with particular attention to the quartet or broken-square question.

Keywords

Rosen Critical Review Logical Structure Hide Variable Alternative Derivation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Isaac Newton,Principia Mathematica, General Scholium. See also I. B. Cohen,Introduction to Newton's “Principia” (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1978), pp. 240–245.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Isaac Newton,Principia Mathematica, General Scholium.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. P. Stapp,Am. J. Phys. 40, 1098–1116 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Bohr,Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1958), p. 71.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Bohr,ibid., p. 64.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Bohr,Essays 1958/1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1963), p. 60.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Heisenberg,Traditions in Science (Seabury Press, New York, 1983), p. 114.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Einstein, inAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Tudor, New York, 1951), p. 87.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Bohm and Y. Aharonov,Phys. Rev. 96, 208–216 (1954).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ref. 1, p. 780.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Rosenfeld, inQuantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983), p. 142.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Bohr,Phys. Rev. 48, 696–702 (1935).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. P. Stapp,Phys. Rev. D 3, 1303–1320 (1971).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Clauser and A. Shimony,Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1882–1927 (1978).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. P. Jarrett,Noûs 18, 569–589 (1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry P. Stapp
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley LaboratoryTheoretical Physics Group, Physics DivisionBerkeley

Personalised recommendations