Skip to main content
Log in

Antenatal diagnosis of short-limb dwarfism: Sonographic approach

  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the findings in 12 patients with skeletal dysplasia diagnosed antenatally, the authors propose a tailored approach to the evaluation of foetuses with shortened long bones, depending on the time of discovery, the degree of shortening and the associated findings. During the second trimester, a very short femur [2 standard deviations (SD) −5 mm and less] most probably corresponds to a bone dysplasia, although the differential diagnosis is mainly early intra-uterine growth retardation, and the foetal skeleton should be surveyed completely in order to find supplementary features suggestive of dwarfism. Anomalies of long bones in their shape, thickness or contour, or spinal ossification disorders or under-mineralisation (best evaluated at the level of calvarial bones) are most helpful in determining the type of dysplasia. A short femur (between 2 SD and 2 SD −4 mm) may indicate growth retardation, a chromosomal anomaly or dwarfism. Follow-up examinations are mandatory in order to differentiate between them. During the third trimester a very short femur may indicate a bone dysplasia and the work-up should be the same as in the second trimester. A short femur may correspond to dwarfism of late development, a growth-retarded foetus or constitutional shortness. Various ratios, especially that of the femur/foot, are helpful in differentiating between them. In case of previous family history, a short or very short femur usually indicates recurrence of the dwarfism. In all cases of antenatal diagnosis, confirmation of the sonographic findings should be obtained either by foetal or neonatal radiographs. The approach proposed by the authors should provide sufficient information to counsel the family not only for the ongoing pregnancy but also for subsequent ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurz AB, Needlman L, Wapner RJ, Hilpert PH et al (1990) Usefulness of a short femur in the in utero diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. Radiology 177: 197–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goncalves L, Jeanty P (1994) Fetal biometry of skeletal dysplasias: a multicentric study. J Ultrasound Med 13: 767–775

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Driscoll DA (1991) Fetal limbs: normal and abnormal. Semin Roentgenol 26: 12–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spirt BA, Oliphant M, Gottlieb RH, Gordon LP (1990) Prenatal sonographic evaluation of short-limbed dwarfism: an algorithmic approach. Radiographics 10: 217–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanders RC, Blakemore K (1989) Lethal fetal anomalies: sonographic demonstration. Radiology 172:1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pretorius DH, Rumack CM, Manco-Johnson ML, Manchester D, Meier P, Bramble J, Cllewell W (1986) Specific skeletal dysplasias in utero: sonographic diagnosis. Radiology 159: 237–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Romero R, Athanassiadis AP, Jeanty P (1989) Fetal skeletal anomalies. Radiol Clin North Am 28: 75–99

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bronshtein N, Keret D, Deutsch M, Liberson A, Bar Chava I (1993) Transvaginal sonographic detection of skeletal anomalies in the first and early trimesters. Prenat Diagn 13: 597–601

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patarelli P, Pretorius D, Edwards DK (1990) IURG mimicking skeletal dysplasia on antenatal US. J Ultrasound Med 9:737–739

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Munoz C, Filly RA, Golbus MS (1990) Osteogenesis imperfecta type II: prenatal sonographic diagnosis. Radiology 174:181–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bulas DI, Stern HJ, Rosenbaum KN, Fonda JA, Glass RBJ, Tifft C (1994) Variable prenatal appearance of osteogenesis imperfecta. J Ultrasound Med 13:419–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brous JTJ, van der Harten HJ, Wladimoroff JW van Geijn HP, Dijkstra PF, Exalto N, Reuss A et al (1988) Prenatal US diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159: 176–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maroteaux P (1982) Maladies osseuses de l'enfant. Flammarion Médecine Sciences, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taybi H, Lachman RS (1990) Radiology of syndromes, metabolic disorders and skeletal dysplasia, 3rd edn. Year Book

  15. Mahony BS, Filly RA, Cooperberg PL (1984) Antenatal diagnosis of achondrogenesis. J Ultrasound Med 3: 333–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Skiptunas SM, Weiner S (1987) Early prenatal diagnosis of asphyxiating thoracic dysplasia (Jenne's syndrome). Value of fetal thoracic measurement. J Ultrasound Med 6: 41–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benaceraff BR, Cnann A, Gelman R, Laboda LA, Frigoletto FD (1989) Can sonographers reliably identify anatomic features associated with Down syndrome in fetuses. Radioloy 173: 377–380

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lynch L, Barkowitz GS, Chitkara U Wilkins IA, Mehalek KE, Berkowicz RL (1989) US detection of Down syndrome: is it really possible? Obstet Gynecol 73: 267–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmer EZ, Divon MY (1992) Sonographic diagnosis of IUGR — macrosomia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 35: 172–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell J, Henderson RGN, Campbell S (1988) The fetal femur/foot ratio: a new parameter to assess dysplastic limb reduction. Obstet Gynecol 72: 181–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Winter RM, Sandin BM, Mitchell RA, Price AB (1984) The radiology of stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Br J Obstet Gynecol 91: 762–765

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Jacques Sauvegrain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avni, E.F., Rypens, F., Zappa, M. et al. Antenatal diagnosis of short-limb dwarfism: Sonographic approach. Pediatr Radiol 26, 171–178 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405292

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405292

Keywords

Navigation