Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 5–14 | Cite as

Invited article: Helical/spiral CT scanning: a pediatric radiology perspective

  • K. S. White


Helical/spiral CT technology has several potential benefits for scanning pediatric patients. These benefits include reduced sedation rates, decreased radiation exposure with scanning at extended pitch, improved image quality, and better three-dimensional and reformatted images. This paper reviews the technical and clinical considerations relevant to scanning the pediatric patient and offers suggestions for protocol development.


Public Health Radiation Image Quality Pediatric Patient Potential Benefit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Brink JA, Heiken JP, Wang G, et al (1994) Helical CT: principles and technical considerations. Radiographics 14:887–893PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G (1992) Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 185:29–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    White KS (1995) Reduced need for sedation in patients undergoing helical CT of the chest and abdomen. Pediatr Radiol 25:344–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Urban BA, Fishman EK, Kuhlman JE, et al (1993) Detection of focal hepatic lesions with spiral CT: comparison of 4- and 8-mm interscan spacing. AJR 160:783–785PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buckley JA, Scott WW, Siegelman SS, et al (1995) Pulmonary nodules: effect of increased data sampling on detection with spiral CT and confidence in diagnosis. Radiology 196:395–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silverman PM, Cooper C, Trock B, et al (1994) The optimal temporal window for CT of the liver using a time-density analysis: implications for helical (spiral) CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:73–79Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silverman PM, O'Malley J, Tefft MC, et al (1995) Conspicuity of hepatic metastases on helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning. AJR 164:619–623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, et al (1995) Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. AJR 164:327–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverman PM, Brown B, Wray H, et al (1995) Optimal contrast enhancement of liver using helical (spiral) CT: value of SmartPrep. AJR 164:1169–1171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuhns LR (1993) Optimal timing of abdominal CT in children: relationship to injection rate. Radiology 189:49–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roche KJ, Ambrosino MM, Genieser NB (1995) Optimization of abdominal CT in children: power injection, initiation time, and ejection rate. Presented at the 80th scientific session of the RSNA, Chicago, Ill., November 27Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berland LL (1995) Slip-ring and conventional dynamic CT: contrast material and timing considerations. Radiology 195:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang C, Vannier MW (1994) Stair-step artifacts in three-dimensional helical CT: an experimental study. Radiology 191:79–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coleman LT, Zimmerman RA (1994) Pediatric craniospinal spiral CT: current applications and future potential. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 15:148–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luker GD, Lee BC, Erickson KK (1993) Spiral CT of the temporal bone in unsedated pediatric patients. AJNR 14:1145–1150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suojanen JN, Mukherji SK, Dupuy DE, et al (1992) Spiral CTevaluation of head and neck lesions: work in progress. Radiology 183:281–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naidich DP (1994) Helical computed tomography of the thorax. Clinical applications. Radiol Clin North Am 32:759–774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Costello P, Anderson W, Blume D (1991) Pulmonary nodule: evaluation with spiral volumetric CT. Radiology 179:875–876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cox TD, White KS, Weinberger E, Effmann EL (1995) Comparison of helical and conventional chest CT in the uncooperative pediatric patient. Pediatr Radiol 25:347–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson JL, Kramer SS, Mahboubi S (1995) Evaluation of suspected air trapping with dynamic CT densitometry. Presented at the 38th annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Radiology. Washington DC, April 27–30Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heiken JP, Brink JA, Sagel SS (1994) Helical CT: abdominal applications. Radiographics 14:919–924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zeman RK, Zeiberg AS, Davros WJ, et al (1993) Routine helical CT of the abdomen: image quality considerations. Radiology 189:395–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herts BR, Einstein DM, Paushter DM (1993) Spiral CT of the abdomen: artifacts and potential pitfalls. AJR 161:1185–1190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kasales CJ, Hopper KD, Ariola DN, et al (1995) Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvement in z-axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped conventional CT scans. AJR 164:1281–1284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fishman EK, Wyatt SH, Bluemke DA, Urban BA (1993) Spiral CT of musculoskeletal pathology: preliminary observations. Skeletal Radiol 22:253–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rubin GD (1994) Three-dimensional helical CT angiography. Radiographics 14:905–912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Von-Hoe L, Marchal G, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S, Mertens L (1995) Determination of scan delay time in spiral CT angiography: utility of a test bolus injection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:216–220PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. S. White
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical ImagingPrimary Children's Medical CenterSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations