Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hepatic spiral CT in children: Scan delay time-enhancement analysis

  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To compare the effect of different time delays between contrast administration and the start of spiral CT scanning on hepatic enhancement in children.Materials and methods. Forty-five children (2–9 years old, mean 6 years) with no evidence of hepatic disease were examined with spiral CT. Sequential spiral scans through the entire liver were performed following a uniphasic injection of non-ionic contrast medium. In group 1 scanning started at 80% of the contrast injection time, in group 2 scanning started at 100% of injection time, and in group 3 scanning started at 150% of injection time. Mean hepatic, aortic, and inferior vena caval enhancement were determined using regions-of-interest measurements.Results. Mean hepatic enhancement was 41.4, 47.0, and 40.6 HU for the 80 %, 100 %, and 150 % injection times, respectively. Enhancement was significantly greater in the 100 % injection time group (p < 0.05). A mean aortocaval difference of greater than 10 HU was present in all examinations.Conclusion. Our results suggest that delaying the initiation of spiral CT scanning until the completion of the contrast injection increases hepatic enhancement in children. These data should help to improve the quality of hepatic spiral CT in pediatric patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bluemke DA, Fishman EK (1993) Spiral CT of the liver. AJR 160: 787–792

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foley WD, Hoffman RG, Quiroz FA, Kahn CE, Perret RS (1994) Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol. Radiology 192: 367–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, Zepp R, Friedman RA, Obuchowski N (1995) Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media and two different delay times. AJR 164: 327–331

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Silverman PM, Cooper C, Trock B, Garra BS, Davros WJ, Zeman RK (1995) The optimal temporal window for CT of the liver using a time-density analysis: implications for helical (spiral) CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19: 73–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silverman PM, O'Malley JA, Teft MC, Cooper C, Zeman RK (1995) Conspicuity of hepatic metastases on helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning. AJR 164: 619–623

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirks DR, Hedland GL, Gelfand MJ (1991) Techniques. In: Kirks DR (ed) Practical pediatric imaging. Little Brown, Boston, pp 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhns LR (1993) Optimal timing of abdominal CT in children: relationship to injection rate. Radiology 189: 49–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burgener FA, Hamlin DJ (1981) Contrast enhancement in abdominal CT: bolus vs infusion. AJR 137: 351–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burgener FA, Hamlin DJ (1983) Contrast enhancement of hepatic tumors in CT: comparison between bolus and infusion techniques. AJR 140: 291–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Anderson JH (1994) Dose requirements for a nonionic contrast agent for spiral computed tomography of the liver in rabbits. Invest Radiol 29: 195–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Foley WD (1989) Dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 170: 617–622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCarthy S, Moss AA (1984) The use of a flow rate injector for contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Radiology 151: 800–802

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shuman WP, Adam JL, Schoenecker SA, Tazioli PR, Moss AA (1986) Use of a power injector during dynamic computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10: 1000–1002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Malinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S.Kingshighway Blvd., 63110, St. Louis, MO, USA

    G. D. Luker, M. J. Siegel & D. A. Bradley

  2. Division of Biostatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    J. D. Baty

Authors
  1. G. D. Luker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. J. Siegel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. A. Bradley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. D. Baty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luker, G.D., Siegel, M.J., Bradley, D.A. et al. Hepatic spiral CT in children: Scan delay time-enhancement analysis. Pediatr Radiol 26, 337–340 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01395710

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01395710

Keywords

Search

Navigation