Abstract
Objective. The goal of the study was to determine whether soft-copy images on high-resolution monitors (2.5 K × 2 K) are suitable for primary interpretation of images from pediatric and neonatal intensive care units. The hypotheses were that hard and soft images yield similar diagnostic information, and that both residents and faculty radiologists can use monitors effectively. Previous reports have produced conflicting results; the need for larger sample sizes has been emphasized.Materials and methods. One thousand one hundred and four images produced by computed radiography using the Kodak Ectascan Imagelink system were prospectively analyzed by two pediatric radiologists, one reading hard copy and the other soft copy of the same images. Bias was controlled by equal distribution of modalities between observers and by daily alternation of modality. Hard- and soft-copy observations of presence or absence of nine specific tubes and nine specific diagnostic findings were compared. Interobserver differences between pediatric radiologists and radiology residents were studied on additional images. The kappa statistic was used to evaluate the level of agreement for all observations.Results. There was excellent agreement between hard and soft copy interpretation for each tube and diagnostic finding (kappa values 0.93–1.0) and excellent interobserver agreement between two pediatric radiologists (kappa values 0.84–1.0). The level of agreement between radiology residents and pediatric radiologist was excellent for the most objective findings. All results were statistically significant (p < 0.001).Conclusion. High resolution soft-copy images are suitable for primary interpretation in patients in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Don S, Cohen MD, Kruger RA, Winkler TA, Katz BP, Li W, Dreesen RG, Kennan N, Tarver R, Klatte EC (1995) Volume detection threshold: quantitative comparison of computed radiography and screen-film radiography in detection of pneumothoraces in an animal model that simulates the neonate. Radiology 194: 727–730
Fajardo LL, Hillman BJ, Pond GD, Carmody RF, Johnson JE, Ferrell WR (1989) Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging. AJR 152:474–480
Kehler M, Albrechtsson U, Andresdottir A, Larusdottir H, Lundin A (1990) Accuracy of digital radiography using stimulable phosphor for diagnosis of pneumothorax. Acta Radiol 31: 47–52
Cohen MD, Katz BP, Kalasinski LA, White SJ, Smith JA, Long B (1991) Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns. Radiology 181: 829–832
Razavi M, Sayre JW, Taira RK, Simons M, Huang HK, Chuang K-S, Rahbar G, Kangarloo H (1992) Receiver-operatingcharacteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2 K × 2 K soft-copy images. AJR 158: 443–448
Thaete FL, Fuhrman CR, Oliver JH, Britton CA, Campbell WL, Feist JH, Straub WH, Davis PL, Plunkett MB (1994) Digital radiography and conven tional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance. AJR 162: 575–581
Frank MS, Jost RG, Molina PL, Anderson DJ, Solomon SL, Whitman RA, Moore SM (1993) High-resolution computer display of portable, digital chest radiographs of adults: suitability for primary interpretation. AJR 160: 473–477
Ker M (1991) Issues in the use of kappa. Invest Radiol 26: 78–83
Steckel RJ, Batra P, Johnson S, Sayre J, Brown K, Haker K, Young D, Zucker M (1995) Comparison of hard- and softcopy digital chest images with different matrix sizes for managing coronary care unit patients. AJR 164: 837–841
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brill, P.W., Winchester, P., Cahill, P. et al. Computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: A comparison of 2.5 K × 2 K soft-copy images vs digital hard-copy film. Pediatr Radiol 26, 333–336 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01395709
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01395709