Abstract
Contrast angiography can demonstrate the vascular components of a vascular malformation, but can be technically challenging in small patients with complex venous anomalies. We reviewed the role of magnetic resonance venography (MRV) in the evaluation of children with predominantly low-flow, vascular malformations of the extremities. MRV (2D time-of-flight technique) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations were performed in ten young patients with congenital predominantly low-flow vascular malformations of the extremities. MR imaging was used to characterize and determine the extent of the malformations, and MRV to evaluate the deep and superficial venous channels. In all patients, MRV studies were reviewed in conjunction with contrast angiograms, considered the gold standard, to confirm the findings. All significant channel anomalies seen with contrast angiography were identified with MRV In addition, MRV demonstrated some veins that were not intentionally opacified during contrast studies. MRV demonstrates both the superficial and deep conducting veins, whereas contrast angiography is a more directed study, evaluating only those channels in tentionally opacified. Together, MR imaging and MRV data can non-invasively form the basis for determining the prognosis and choosing the individual treatment of congenital vascular malformations of the extremities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mulliken JB, Glowacki J (1982) Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 69: 412–420
Meyer JS, Hoffer FA, Barnes PB, Mulliken JB (1991) Biological classification of soft-tissue vascular anomalies: MR correlation. AJR 157: 559–564
Rak KM, Yakes WF, Ray RL, et al (1992) MR imaging of symptomatic vascular malformations. AJR 159:107–112
Thomas ML (1988) Radiologic assessment of vascular malformations. In: Mulliken JB, Young AE (eds) Vascular birthmarks. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 141–159
Young AE (1988) Combined vascular malformations. In: Mulliken JB, Young AE (eds) Vascular birthmarks. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 246–265
Mulliken JB (1988) Classification of vascular birthmarks. In: Mulliken JB, Young AE (eds) Vascular birthmarks. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 24–37
Young AE (1988) Clinical assessment of vascular malformations. In: Mulliken JB, Young AE (eds) Vascular birthmarks. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 246–265
Gloviczki P, Stanson AW, Stickler GB, et al (1991) Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome: the risks and benefits of vascular interventions. Surgery 110: 469–479
Thomas ML, Macfie GB (1974) Phlebography in the Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. Acta Radiol Diagn 15: 43–56
Thomas ML, Andress MR (1971) Angiography in venous dysplasias of the limbs. AIR 113:722–731
Burrows PE, Mulliken JB, Fellows KE, Strand RD (1983) Childhood hemangiomas and vascular malformations: angiographic differentiation. AJR 141: 483–488
Finn JP, Goldmann A, Hartnell GG (1993) Venography in the abdomen and pelvis. In: Potchen EJ, Haacke EM, Siebert JE, Gottschalk A (eds) Magnetic resonance angiography: concepts and applications. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, pp 607–623
Wallner B, Edelmann RR, Kim D (1992) Magnetic resonance angiography. In: Kim D, Orron DE (eds) Peripheral vascular imaging and intervention. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, pp 201–203
Kim D, Edelmann RR, Kent KC, Porter DH, Skillman JJ (1990) Abdominal aorta and renal artery stenosis: evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 174:727–731
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laor, T., Burrows, P.E. & Hoffer, F.A. Magnetic resonance venography of congenital vascular malformations of the extremities. Pediatr Radiol 26, 371–380 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01387309
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01387309