Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical elements in the aragonitic and calcitic microstructural groups of shell of the oysterCrassostrea virginica: A proton probe study

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report the results of a study with proton-induced X-ray emissions (PIXE) of the distribution and concentration of 15 chemical elements (Na to Sr in periodic chart) in four microstructural and two mineralogical regions of shell of rapidly growing adult oysters [Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin)]. Hatchery-raised oysters were grown in Broadkill Estuary, Delaware, USA, for 16 wk in summer 1978. Their valve edges were filed as a marker, and the oysters were replaced in the estuary, where they grew rapidly. Shell deposited after marking had a normal microstructure and mineralogy after a narrow zone of disturbance. After 17 d oysters were sacrificed, and different mineralogical and microstructural regions of valves of three oysters, and parts of valves of two oysters, were analyzed for the elements Na to Sr. Quadrats (2.5 × 0.45 mm) included three calcitic groups (prismatic, foliated, chalky) and one aragonitic (myostracal) microstructural group; four quadrats were on the exterior and five on the interior of right and left valves. Inhalant and exhalant margins of valves and ground right and left valves of one oyster were also analyzed. Elemental chemistry of different regions of shell varied among the three microstructural groups within the single calcitic polymorph, between aragonitic and calcitic regions, and between exhalant and inhalant margins of the valves. Elements were most concentrated in the prismatic region of the right valve. Element concentrations were similar in ground right and left valves, except for higher levels of Si, Fe, and Zn in the right valve (corresponding to their high contents in prismatic shell) and of Cl in the left valve (reflecting high concentration in chalky shell, abundant in this valve). Na, Mg, Cl, Cr, Cu, Zn and Br were more concentrated in prismatic than in foliated shell. Chalky shell contained higher concentrations of Na than did prismatic shell, and high concentrations (but lower than in prismatic shell) of Mg, Cl, Ti, Mn, Fe, Zn and Br. Element concentration in myostracum was approximately the same as, or lower than, in foliated shell, except for Sr, which was higher than that in any other shell group. In the right valve most elements were concentrated in inhalant margins, and on the left valve, in exhalant margins. With increased weathering of the exterior surface of prismatic shell, Mg, Si, and Mn increased in concentration and Na, Al, Cl, Ti, Cr, Fe, Br, and Sr decreased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Bopp, F. III, Biggs, R. B. (1981). Metals in estuarine sediments: factor analysis and its environmental significance. Science, N.Y. 214: 441–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgoin, B. P. (1990).Mytilus edulis shell as a bio-indicator of lead pollution: considerations on bioavailability and variability. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 61: 253–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Broecker, W. S., Peng, T. H. (1982). Tracers in the sea. Lamont-Doherty Press, Palisades, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R. (1986). Influence of suspended particles on biology of oyster larvae in estuaries. Am. malac. Bull. 3 (spec. ed.): 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R. (1991). The shell and ligament. In: Eble, A., Kennedy, V. (eds.) Biology, culture, and management of the American oyster. Maryland Office of Sea Grant, College Park (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R., Palmer, R. E. (1979). A new mineralized layer in the hinge of the oyster. Science, N.Y. 206: 691–693

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R., Palmer, R. E., Prezant, R. S. (1980a). Functional ultramorphology of the dissoconch valves of the oysterCrassostrea virginica. Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 70: 139–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R., Palmer, R. E., Sick, L. V., Johnson, C. C. (1980b). Interaction of mineral elements in sea water and shell of oysters (Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin)) cultured in controlled and natural systems. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 46: 279–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R., Swann, C. P., Ewart, J. W. (1982). An exploratory study with the proton microprobe of the ontogenetic distribution of 16 elements in the shell of living oysters (Crassostrea virginica). Mar. Biol. 69: 235–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, R., Stoner, J. H. (1975). Trace elements in total particulate material from surface seawater. Nature, Lond. 255: 50–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, R. E., Carville, T. E., Martinez, J. D. (1973). Trace metals in oyster shells. Envir. Letters 4: 311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtsoff, P. S. (1964). The American oyster,Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 64: 1–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Imlay, M. (1982). Use of shells of freshwater mussels in monitoring heavy metals and environmental stresses: a review. Malac. Rev. 15: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Immega, N. T. (1976). Environmental influences on trace element concentrations in some modern and fossil oysters. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geology, Indiana University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Loosanoff, V. L., Nomejko, C. A. (1955). Growth of oysters with damaged shell-edges. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 108: 151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorens, R. B., Bender, M. L. (1980). The impact of solution chemistry onMytilus edulis calcite and aragonite. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 44: 1265–1278

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, F., Hirano, M. (1980). Chemical composition of some modern marine pelecypod shells. Sci. Rep. Inst. Geosci. Univ. Tsukuba (Sec. B) 1: 163–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberly, R. Jr (1968). Composition of magnesian calcites of algae and pelecypods by electron microprobe analysis. Sedimentology 11: 61–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakahara, H., Bevelander, G. (1970). An electron microscope study of the muscle attachment in the molluscPinctada radiata. Texas Rep. Biol. Med. 28: 279–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Newball, S., Carriker, M. R. (1983). Systematic relationship of the oystersCrassostrea rhizophorae andC. virginica: a comparative ultrastructural study of the valves. Am. malac. Bull. 1: 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. E., Carriker, M. R. (1979). Effects of cultural conditions on morphology of the shell of the oysterCrassostrea virginica. Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 69: 58–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. J. H. (1980). Quantitative aquatic biological indicators: their use to monitor trace metal and organochlorine pollution. Applied Science Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, G. D. (1980). An ontogenetic approach to the environmental significance of bivalve shell chemistry. In: Rhoads, D. C., Lutz, R. A. (eds.) Skeletal growth of aquatic organisms, biological records of environmental change. Plenum Press, New York, p. 133–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkiss, K. (1983). Trace elements as probes of biomineralization. In: Westbroek, P., de Jong, E. W. (eds.) Biomineralization and biological metal accumulation. Biological and geological perspectives. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston, p. 363–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompa, A., Watabe, N. (1976). Ultrastructural investigation of the mechanism of muscle attachment to the gastropod shell. J. Morph. 149: 339–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Turekian, K. K., Armstrong, R. L. (1960). Magnesium, strontium, and barium concentrations and calcite-aragonite ratios of some recent molluscan shells. J. mar. Res. 18: 133–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, K., Fujinuki, T. (1976). Biomineralization in bivalve molluscs with emphasis on the chemical composition of the extrapallial fluid. In: Watabe, N., Wilbur, K. M. (eds.) The mechanisms of mineralization in the invertebrates and plants. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, p. 175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, K., Suga, S. (1976). The distribution of some elements in the shell of freshwater and marine bivalves by electron microprobe analysis. Bull. natn. Pearl Res. Lab. 20: 2219–2240

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, K. M. (1964). Shell formation and regeneration. In: Wilbur, K. M., Yonge, C. M. (eds.) Physiology of the Mollusca, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, p. 243–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, K. M. (1972). Shell formation in mollusks. In: Florkin, M., Scheer, B. T. (eds.) Chemical zoology. Academic Press, New York, p. 103–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, K. M., Saleuddin, A. S. M. (1983). Shell formation. In: Saleuddin, S. M., Wilbur, K. M. (eds.) The Mollusca, Vol. 4, Physiology, Part 1. Academic Press, New York, p. 235–287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. Grassle, New Brunswick

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carriker, M.R., Swann, C.P., Prezant, R.S. et al. Chemical elements in the aragonitic and calcitic microstructural groups of shell of the oysterCrassostrea virginica: A proton probe study. Mar. Biol. 109, 287–297 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01319397

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01319397

Keywords

Navigation