Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical evaluation of technetium-99m infecton for the localisation of bacterial infection

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to distinguish infection from inflammation in patients with suspected infection using technetium-99m Infecton. Ninety-nine patients (102 studies) referred for infection evaluation underwent imaging with 400 MBq99mTc-Infecton at 1 and 4 h. Most patients had appropriate microbiological tests and about half (56) had radiolabelled white cell scans as well. No adverse effects were noted in any patient. The clinical efficacy of99mTc-Infecton depended in part on whether imaging was undertaken during intibiotic therapy for infection or not. In consultation with the microbiologist, 5–14 days of appropriate and successful antibiotic therapy was considered adequate to classify some results as true-negatives. The figures for sensitivity and specificity of99mTc-Infecton for active or unsuccessfully treated infection were 83% and 91% respectively. It is concluded that99mTc-Infecton imaging contributed to the differential diagnosis of inflammation. It is being used as the first imaging modality when bacterial infection is suspected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Solanki KK, Bomanji J, Siraj Q et al.99mTc-Infecton: A new class of radiopharmaceutical for imaging infection.J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 119P.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hooper DC, Wolfson JS, Ng EY, Schwartz MN. Mechanisms of action of and resistance to ciprofloxacin.Am J Med 1987; 82 Suppl 4A: 12–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vinjamuri S, Hall AV, Solanki KK et al. Comparison of99mTc-Infecton with radiolabelled white cells imaging in the evaluation of bacterial infectionq.Lancet 1996; 347: 233–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thakur ML. Cell labelling: achievements, challengers and prospects.J Nucl Med 1987; 22: 1011–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Solanki KK, Mather SHJ, Al-Janabi M, Britton KE. A rapid method for the preparation of99mTc hexametazine-labelled leucocytes.Nucl Med Commun 1988; 10: 753–761.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corstens FHM. Highlights of the Annual Meeting of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Brussels 1995. The art of imaging the body.Eur J Nucl Med 1996; 23: 75–90 (Fig. 7).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Becker W. The contribution of nuclear medicine to the patient with infection.Eur J Nucl Med 1995; 22: 1195–1211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peters AM. Localising the cause of an undiagnosed fever.Eur J Nucl Med 1996; 23: 239–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Britton, K.E., Vinjamuri, S., Hall, A.V. et al. Clinical evaluation of technetium-99m infecton for the localisation of bacterial infection. Eur J Nucl Med 24, 553–556 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01267688

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01267688

Key words

Navigation