Purpose
Murine two-cell embryos (n =5573) were cultured for 96 hr in human tubal fluid (HTF) medium (n =2709) or alpha modification of minimum essential medium (MEM; n =2864) through the hatched blastocyst stage from mid-1990 to mid-1991. An additional 373 embryos were cultured in MEM or HTF with 0, 1, 5, or 10 ng/ml E. coli endotoxin. A total of 17 patients had supernumerary embryos simultaneously cultured in HTF (n =48) or MEM (n =61). Additionally, pregnancy rates were compared for July to December 1990, when MEM was used as growth medium, and for July to December 1989, when HTF was used.
Results
Blastocyst formation was higher (P <0.001) for murine embryos cultured in MEM (blasts = 95%) compared to HTF (blasts = 70%). When cultured with endotoxin, blastocyst formation was higher (P <0.01) for embryos cultured in MEM compared with HTF for controls and at each endotoxin level. No difference in human blastocyst development was observed in HTF and MEM. However, more MEM-cultured blastocysts were cryopreserved (P <0.05). There also was a lower spontaneous abortion rate and a higher multiple gestation rate when embryos were cultured in MEM.
Conclusion
Thus, MEM may result in healthier blastocyst development, especially when culture conditions are substandard, although this is not an acceptable substitution for meticulous technique.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fishel SB, Cohen J, Fehilly C, Purdy JM, Walters DE, Edwards RG: Factors influencing human embryonic development in vitro.In In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, M Seppala, RG Edwards (eds). New York Academy of Science, 1985, pp 342–356
Quinn P, Kerin JF, Warnes GM: Improved pregnancy in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium based on the composition of human tubal fluid. Fertil Steril 1985;44:493–498
Cummins JM: Comparison of two media in a human in vitro fertilization program: Lack of significant differences in pregnancy rate. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986;3:326–329
Lopata A, Hay DL: The potential of early human embryos to form blastocysts, hatch from their zona, and secrete hCG in culture. Hum Reprod 1989;4:87–94
Lopata A, Hay DL: The surplus human embryo: its potential for growth, blastulation, hatching, and hCG production in culture. Fertil Steril 1989;51:984–991
Muggleton-Harris AL, Findlay I, Whittingham DG: Improvement of the culture conditions for the development of human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1990;5:217–220
Snyman E, Van der Merwe JV: Endotoxin-polluted medium in a human in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1986;46:273–276
Fishel S, Jackson P, Webster J, Faratian B: Endotoxins in culture medium for human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988;49:108–111
Montoro L, Subias E, Young P, Baccaro M, Swanson J, Sueldo C: Detection of endotoxin in human in vitro fertilization by the zona-free mouse embryo assay. Fertil Steril 1990;54:109–112
Randall GW, Gantt PA: Preimplantation murine embryos are more resistant than human embryos to bacterial endotoxins. Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1990;7:280–282
Dumoulin JCM, Menheere PPCA, Evers JLH, Kleukers APG, Pieters MHEC, Bras M, Geraedts JPM: The effects of endotoxins on gametes and preimplantation embryos cultured in vitro. Hum Reprod 1991;6:730–734
Zarutskie PW, Dixon LL, Hiller SL: Identifying sources of bacterial endotoxin contamination in an in vitro fertilization culture environment. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:77–80
Ng SC, Edirisinghe WR, Sathananthan AH, Ratnam SS: Bacterial infection of human oocytes during in vitro fertilization. Int J Fertil 1987;32:298–301
Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Rye PH, Matulich EM: Relationship of follicle number, serum estradiol, and other factors to birth rate and multiparity in human menopausal gonadotropin induced intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 1991;56:89–92
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olar, T.T., Potts, A.S. Effects of medium composition on murine and human blastocyst formation and hatching rate. J Assist Reprod Genet 10, 192–196 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239220
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239220