Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 153–159 | Cite as

Employment growth and innovation at the firm level

An empirical study
  • Erik Brouwer
  • Alfred Kleinknecht
  • Jeroen O. N. Reijnen
Article

Abstract

We analyze the influence of innovation on growth rates of employment in 859 Dutch manufacturing firms over the period 1983–1988. Whereas the (growth of the) R&D intensity of firms has a slightly negative impact on employment, we find that firms with a high share of product-related R&D (as a proxi of R&D related to industrial activities in an early stage of the life cycle) experienced an above average growth of employment. The same holds for firms which directed their R&D towards information technology. Smaller firms have, ceteris paribus, substantially higher growth rates of employment than their larger counterparts. Against our expectations, R&D cooperation has no significant impact on employment growth. The same holds for activities in the fields of biotechnology and new materials.

Key words

Innovation Product-related R&D Employment growth Firm size Information technology 

JEL-classification

O33 J23 C23 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belsley A, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression diagnostics. Identifying influental data and sources of collinearity. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. De Wit GR (1990) Technology and employment. A literature survey (in Dutch). OSA werkdocument W70, March, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  3. Evans DS (1987) The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. J Industrial Econ 35:567–581Google Scholar
  4. Freeman C (1982) The economics of industrial innovation. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Judge GG, Carter Hill R, Griffiths WE, Lütkepohl H, Lee T-C (1988) Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaldor N (1966) Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Kleinknecht A, Reijnen JON, Verweij JJ (1990) Innovation in the Dutch manufacturing and service industries. A mailing survey (in Dutch). Ministry of Economic Affairs (series: Beleids-studies Technologie en Economie, no. 6, April), The HagueGoogle Scholar
  8. Kleinknecht A (1990) Are there Schumpeterian waves of innovations? Cambridge J Econ 14: 81–92Google Scholar
  9. Kleinknecht A (1992) A pre-test of innovation survey questions in five countries. Synthesis report for the meeting of the EUROSTAT Task Force “Innovation” on 12 March 1992 at Luxembourg; forthcoming as chapter 7, in: Kleinknecht A, Bain D (eds.) New concepts in innovation output measurement. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Knibbe A, Van den Noord PJ (1983) On the relevance and stability of Verdoorn's law. Research Memorandum, no. 83-31, University of AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Maddala GS (1983) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Econometric Society Publication No. 3 CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3:639–656Google Scholar
  13. White H (1982) Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50:1–25Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Brouwer
    • 1
  • Alfred Kleinknecht
    • 1
  • Jeroen O. N. Reijnen
    • 1
  1. 1.Foundation for Economic ResearchUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations