Advertisement

Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 145–152 | Cite as

Dynamic R&D competition with memory

  • Engelbert J. Dockner
  • Gustav Feichtinger
  • Alexander Mehlmann
Article

Abstract

We consider a differential game of R&D competition and explore the impact of rivalry on the firms' investment behavior over time. Using closed-loop strategies and hence allowing for strategic interactions among rival firms we show that R&D spending by the individual competitor is increased due to competition in the race for priority. This leads us to argue that competitive encounters enhance R&D activities at the same time as increasing efficiency in the race for a technological breakthrough.

Key words

R&D Industrial organization Stragegic interaction Dynamic games 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Başar T, Olsder GJ (1982) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Dasgupta P, Stiglitz J (1980) Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. Economic Journal 90:266–293Google Scholar
  3. Dockner E, Feichtinger G, Mehlmann A (1986) On the value of information in dynamic games of R&D. Research Report No. 85, Department of Econometrics, Operations Research and Systems Theory, Technical University of ViennaGoogle Scholar
  4. Feichtinger G (1982) Optimal policies for two firms in a noncooperative research project. In: Feichtinger G (ed) Optimal control theory and economic analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 373–397Google Scholar
  5. Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1982) Market structure and innovation. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Loury GC (1979) Market structure and innovation. Quarterly J Econ 93:395–410Google Scholar
  7. Mehlmann A (1988) Applied differential games. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Mehlmann A, Willing R (1983) On non-unique closed-loop Nash equilibria for a class of differential games with a unique and degenerated feedback solution. J Optimization Theory Applications 41:463–472Google Scholar
  9. Reinganum JF (1981) Dynamic games of innovation. J Econ Theory 25:21–41Google Scholar
  10. Reinganum JF (1982) A dynamic game of R&D: patent protection and competitive behavior. Econometrica 50:671–688Google Scholar
  11. Selten R (1965) Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit. Z Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 121:301–324Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Engelbert J. Dockner
    • 1
  • Gustav Feichtinger
    • 2
  • Alexander Mehlmann
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BielefeldGermany
  2. 2.Technical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations