Skip to main content
Log in

Simulating conversations: The communion game

  • Published:
AI & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In their enthusiasm for programming, computational linguists have tended to lose sight of what humansdo. They have conceived of conversations as independent of sound and the bodies that produce it. Thus, implicit in their simulations is the assumption that the text is the essence of talk. In fact, unlike electronic mail, conversations are acoustic events. During everyday talk, human understanding depends both on the words spoken and on fine interpersonal vocal coordination. When utterances are analysed into sequences of word-based forms, however, these prosodic aspects of language disappear. Therefore, to investigate the possibility that machines might talk, we propose acommunion game that includes this interpersonal patterning. Humans and machines would talk together and, based on recordings of them, a panel would appraise the relevant merit of each machine's simulation by how true to life it sounded. Unlike Turing's imitation game, the communion game overtly focuses attention, not on intelligence, but on language. It is designed to facilitate the development of social groups of adaptive robots that exploit complex acoustic signals in real time. We consider how the development of such machines might be approached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, W.S. (1973)Accent and rhythm prosodic, features of latin and Greek: A study in theory and reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, G. (1990). A psychoanalyst takes the Turing test.Psychoanalytic Review 77(1), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J.M. & Heritage, J., Eds. (1984).Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, P., and di Luzio, A., Eds. (1992).The contextualization of language Amsterdam: John Benjamens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979).Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P.P.G. (1988). Biological evolution of cooperation and trust. In D. Gambetta (Ed.),Trust: Making and breaking of cooperative relations Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieri, P. (1988). Thinking machines: Some reflections on the Turing test.Poetics Today, 9(1), 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1978). Troubles with functionalism. In C.W. Savage (Ed.),Perception and cognition: Issues in the foundations of psychology. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 9, pp. 261–325). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1981). Psychologism and behaviorism.The Philosophical Review, 90(1), 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L. (1933).Language. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.A. (1991a). Intelligence without reason. InIJCAI-91: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia (Vol. 1), pp. 569–595. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.A. (1991b). Intelligence without representation.Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E.D. (1979). The song of the common crow,Corvus brachyrhynchos. Master's thesis at University of Maryland, College Park.

  • Carling, C. & Moore, T. (1982).Language understanding: Towards a post-Chomskyan linguistics. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957)Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986).Knowledge and language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1988).Language and problems of knowledge: The Managua lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clocksin, W.F., & Moore, A.M. (1989). Experiments in adaptive state-space robotics. InAISB89: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, Brighton, UK, pp. 115–125. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, K.M., Hilf, F.D., Weber, S., Kraemer, H.C. (1972). Turing-like indistinguishability tests for the validation of a computer simulation of paranoid processes.Artificial Intelligence, 3, 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S. J. (1993).The place of prosody in Italian conversations Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S.J. (1994). Conversational functions of rhythmical patterning—A behavioural perspective.Language & Communication, 14(4), 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, S.J. (1996). Conversation, coordination, and vertebrate communication.Semiotica.

  • Crystal, D. (1969).Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. (1992).What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farabaugh, S. M. (1982). The ecological and social significance of duetting. In D. Kroodsma, E.H. Miller, and H. Ouelett (Eds.).Acoustic communication in birds: Song learning and its consequences (Vol. 2, pp. 85–124). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry. (1975)The language of thought. New York: Cromwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R.M. (1990). Subcognition and the limits of the Turing test.Mind 99(393), 53–65.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, H. & Coupland, N. (1991).Language: Contexts and consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1931). Uber formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I.Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38, 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J.J. (1982),Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, K. (1971).Mentality and machines New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Meaning of the construction of reality in early childhood. In H.L. Pick, Jr., & E. Salzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 67–96) Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1979). One child's protolanguage. In M. Bullowa (Ed.),Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication (pp. 171–190). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (1989). Minds, machines and Searle.Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 1, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem.Physica D, 42, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994).The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1981).The language myth. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1987).The language machine. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. `t, Collier, R. & Cohen, A. (1990).A perceptual study of intonation: An experimental approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, L. (1993). Reaping the whirlwind: Reply to Harnad's “Other Bodies, Other Minds.”Minds and Machines, 3(2), 219–237.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, A.G., Yeomanson, E.W., & Gee, A.C. (1973).Teleprinter Handbook. Hertfordshire, UK: Radio Society of Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultzén, L.S. (1964). Grammatical intonation. In D. Abercrombie, D.B. Fry, P.A.D. MacCarthy, N.C. Scott, J.L.M. Trim (Eds.),In honour of Daniel Jones: Papers contributed on the occasion of his eightieth birthday (pp. 85–95). London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxor, A.P. (1994).Artificial intelligence as writing: Knowledge-based hypertext systems as medium for communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middlesex University, Middlesex, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquette, D. (1993). A turing test conversation.Philosophy, 68(264), 231–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karelis, C. (1986). Reflections on the Turing test.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 16(2), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B. (1990). Using English for indexing and retrieving. In P.H. Winston and S.A. Shellard (Eds.),Artificial Intelligence at MIT: Expanding Frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, D.H. (1977). Review of the ARPA speech understanding project.JASA, 62(6) 1345–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R., & Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation. In J. R. Krebs and N.B. Davies (Eds.),Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach (2nd ed., pp. 380–402) Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J. (1980).The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J. (1993).Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S.C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E.N. Goody (Ed.),Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D.B. & Guha, R.V. (1990).Building large knowledge-based systems: Representation and inference in the Cyc project. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1993).The child's path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowerre, T., & Reddy, D.R. (1980). The Harpy speech understanding system. In W.A. Lea (Ed.),Trends in speech recognition (pp. 340–360). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J.R. (1961). Minds, machines and Gödel.Philosophy, 36, 112–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1977).Semantics (Vols. 1–2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards,The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and the science of symbolism (pp. 451–510). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P.R., & Bateson, P. (1986).Measuring behavior: An introductory guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P.H. (1993).Grammatical theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, D. (1993). Book review: Building large knowledge-based systems: Representation and inference in the Cyc project, D.B. Lenat & R.V. Guha.Artificial Intelligence, 61(1), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mey, J.L. (1993).Pragmatics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, D. (1993). Turing's test and conscious thought.Artificial Intelligence, 60(1), 1–22.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, D., & Chambers, R. (1968). Boxes: an experiment in adaptive control. In E. Dale and D. Michie (Eds.),Machine Intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 137–152). Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N.J. (1984). Shakey the robot. Technical Note 323, SRI AI Center, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C.K., & Richards, I.A. (1923).The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and the science of symbolism. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omohundro, S.M. (1990). Geometric learning algorithms.Physica D, 42(1–3), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1989).The emperor's new mind Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevost, S. & Steedman, M. (1994). Specifying intonation from context for speech synthesis.Speech and communication, 15, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de (1916).Course de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. English Translation [1959],Course in general linguistics. London: Peter Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.G., & Ableson, R.P. (1977).Scripts, Goals, Plans and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949).The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shanon, B. (1989). A simple comment regarding the Turing test.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 19(2), 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shieber, S.M. (1994). Lessons from a restricted Turing test.Communications of the ACM, 37(6), 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, K. (1994). Evolving 3D morphology and behavior by competition.Artificial Life IV Proceedings, pp. 28–39. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slezak, P. (1982). Gödel's theorem and the mind.British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 33, 41–52.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionismBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(1), 1–23.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerhoff, G., & MacDorman, K.F. (1994). An account of consciousness in physical and functional terms: A target for research in the neurosciences.Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 29(2), 151–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986).Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M. (1991). Structure and intonation.Language, 68, 260–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.F. (1950). On referring.Mind, 59, 320–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R.S. (1988). Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences.Machine Learning, 3(1), 9–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, W.H. (1972). Duetting and antiphonal song in birds: Its extent and significance,Behavior, Suppl.18, pp. 1–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and co-operation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (Ed.),Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication (pp. 321–348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1986). Sharing makes sense: Intersubjectivity and the making of an infant's meaning. In R. Steele and T. Threadgold (Eds.),Language Topics: Essays in honour of M. Halliday, (Vol. 1, pp. 177–200) Amsterdam: J. Benjamens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence.Mind 59, 433–460.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Üxküll, J.J., Baron von (1921).Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waibel, A. (1988).Prosody and speech recognition. London: Pitman.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C.J.C.H., & Dayan, P. (1992). Q-learning.Machine Learning, 8(3–4), 279–292.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weizenbaum, J. (1965). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine.Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 9, 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizenbaum, J. (1976).Computing power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheddon, C., & Linggard, R. (1990).Speech and language processing. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, R. (1983).Planning and understanding: A computational approach to human reasoning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1986).Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. (1972).Understanding natural language New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958).Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowley, S.J., MacDorman, K. Simulating conversations: The communion game. AI & Soc 9, 116–137 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210600

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01210600

Key words

Navigation