Skip to main content
Log in

Transfer of embryos into the uterus: How much do technical factors affect pregnancy rates?

  • Clinical Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Objective

Our objective was to identify the effect on outcome of (a) ultrasound-assisted embryo transfer, (b) the use of different embryo transfer catheters, and (c) the length of time the patients remain in the supine position after embryo transfer.

Setting

The setting was a private fertility center.

Subjects

This was a prospective study of 178 in vitro fertilization and embryo transfers (IVF-ET) and 63 frozen embryo replacements (FER).

Results

The pregnancy rate was 28.7% following IVF-ET and 31.8% for FER. Ultrasound-assisted transfer did not affect the outcome (29 vs 30.3%). There was no difference in the performance of the Wallace and Frydman catheters with regard to outcome (30.3 vs 30.7%). Although there was an increase in pregnancy rate as the time interval in the supine position after ET increased, this needs a larger study.

Conclusion

The parameter studies did not affect the outcome of IVF/ET or FER. Some factors encouraged us to recommend ultrasound-assisted transfer in some cases, and the use of a Frydman catheter for transfer and to encourage the supine position after transfer for longer periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wisanto A, Janssens R, Deschacht J, Camus M, Devroey P, VanSteirteghem AC: Performance of different embryo transfer catheters in human in vitro fertilization process. Fertil Steril 1989;52:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hurley VA, Osborn JC, Leoni MA, Leeton J: Ultrasound guided embryo transfer: A controlled trial. Fertil Steril 1991;55:559–562

    Google Scholar 

  3. Waterstone J, Curson R, Parsons J: Embryo transfer to low uterine cavity. Lancet 1991;337:1413

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gonen Y, Dirnfeld M, Goldman S, Koifman M, Abramovid H: Does the choice of catheter for embryo transfer influence the success rate of in-vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod 1991;6:1092–1991

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Shawaf T, Nolan A, Nadkarni P, Harper J, Brown J, Guirgis R, Emerson G, Bayly M, Craft I: The reproduction outcome following a super high response to stimulation in gamete intrafallopian transfer programme: J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1991;8:202–207

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith B, Porter R, Ahuja K, Craft I: Ultrasonic assessment of endometrial changes in stimulated cycles in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer progamme. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1984;1:223–238

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yovich JL, Turner SR, Murphy AJ: Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1985;44:318–322

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Shawaf, T., Dave, R., Harper, J. et al. Transfer of embryos into the uterus: How much do technical factors affect pregnancy rates?. J Assist Reprod Genet 10, 31–36 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204437

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204437

Key words

Navigation