Skip to main content
Log in

Preferential looking: Parameters and preliminary data of a new computerized version

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A computerized version of preferential looking (CPL) was developed by the authors. Formal parameters (spatial frequency, luminance, contrast of the stimuli; randomized procedure; computerized statistical control) and preliminary binocular acuity results in 69 healthy children (6–36 months) are compared to those of OPL, FPL and ACP version. Low cost, standardized procedure, statistical control of visual acuity estimates and the need of one operator only are among CPL advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACP:

Acuity cards procedure

PL:

Preferential looking

CPL:

Computerized preferential looking

FPL:

Forced-choice preferential looking

OPL:

Operant preferential looking

OKN:

Opto kinetic mystagmus

VEP:

Visually evoked potentials

References

  1. Dobson V, Teller DY. Visual acuity in human infants: A review and comparison of behavioral and electrophisiological studies. Vision Res 1978; 18: 1469.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dobson V, Salem D, Mayer DL, Moss C, Sebris L. Visual acuity screening of children 6 months to 3 years of age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 1057.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis GS, Hartmann EE. Teller acuity cards versus clinical judgment in the diagnosis of ambliopia with strabismus. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 788.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer DL, Dobson V. Visual acuity development in infants and young children: a new operant approach yields estimates of acuity. Vision Res 1982; 82: 1141.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Teller DY, McDonald MA, Preston K, Sebris L, Dobson V. Assessment of visual acuity in infants and children: The acuity card procedure. Dev Med Child Neurol 1986; 28: 779.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vitale Brovarone F, Fea A, Porro G, Soldi A, Perino P. Results with the operant preferential looking method in determination of the increase in visual acuity curve in 116 normal infants aged 6–36 months. New Trends in Ophthalmol 1988; 2: 121.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vitale Brovarone F, Zaffaroni M, Fea A, Porro G, Soldi A, Bona G. La determinazione dell'acuita visiva mediante la metodica di visione preferenziale versione operativa: Studio in soggetti da 6 a 36 mesi affetti da ipotiroidismo congenito. Boll Ocul (suppl) 1988; 3: 345.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vitale Brovarone F, Zaffaroni M, Fea A, Solid A, Porro G. Sviluppo dell'acuita visiva in bambini nati pretermine e a termine indagato con la metodica di Visione Preferenziale. Boll Ocul (suppl) 1988; 3: 323.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vitale Brovarone F, Fea A, porro G, Soldi A. Visual acuity development in normal subjects from birth to the thirty-sixth month of age (assessed by preferential looking). New Trends in Ophthalmol 1989; 4: 55.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brown AM, Yamamoto Y. Visual acuity in newborn and preterm infants measured with grating aucity cards. Am J Ophthalmol 1986; 102: 245.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dobson V, Karen P. Rapid assessment of visual acuity of infants and toddlers, using the acuity card procedure. Dev Med Child Neurol 1986; 84: 119.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dobson V, Schwartz T, Sandstrom DJ, Michel L. Binocular visual acuity of neonates: The acuity card procedure. Dev Med Child Neurol 1987; 29: 199.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fantz RL, Ordy S. Maturation of pattern vision in infants during the first 6 months. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1962; 55: 907.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fulton AM, Hansen RM, Manning AM. Measuring visual acuity in infants. Survey of Ophthalmol 1981; 25: 325.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McDonald MA, Dobson V, Sebris SL, Varner D, Teller DY. The acuity card procedure: A rapid test of infant acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 1158.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Thompson JR, Minshull C. Grating and recognition acuities of young ambliopes. Br J Ophthalmol 1988; 72: 50.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Preston KL, McDonald MA. Validation of the acuity card procedure for assessment of infants with ocular disorders. Ophthalmoloy 1987; 94: 644.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stager DR, Birch EE. Preferential looking acuity and stereopsis in infantile esotropia. J Ped Ophthalmol Strab 1986; 23: 160.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Teller DY, Morse R, Borton R, Regal D. Visual acuity for vertical and diagonal gratings in human infants. Vision Res 1974; 14: 1433.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vitale Brovarone, F., Fea, A., Piat, L.C. et al. Preferential looking: Parameters and preliminary data of a new computerized version. Doc Ophthalmol 83, 299–305 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204331

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204331

Key words

Navigation