Skip to main content
Log in

In vivo fertilization procedures in infertile women with patent fallopian tubes: A comparison of gamete intrafallopian transfer, combined intrauterine and intraperitoneal insemination, and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation alone

  • Original Manuscripts
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the relative efficacy of three in vivo methods of assisted fertilization in 150 infertile women with patent fallopian tubes: gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), combined intrauterine and direct intraperitoneal insemination (IUI + DIPI), and controlled hyperstimulation (COHS) alone. The clinical pregnancy rate was highest in the IUI/DIPI and GIFT groups: IUI/DIPI, 29.3%; GIFT, 28.6%; and COHS, 8.9%. We believe that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation combined with IUI and DIPI is a good alternative to GIFT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Craft I, Shawaf TA, Lewis P, Serhal P, Simons E, Ah-Moye M, Fiamanya W, Robertson D, Shrivastar P, Brinsden P: Analysis of 1071 GIFT procedures—the case for a flexible approach to treatment. Lancet 1988;1:1094–1098

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henriksen T, Åbyholm T, Tanbo T, Magnus Ø: Gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). The results of 95 consecutive treatments. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68:197–200

    Google Scholar 

  3. DiMarzo SH, Rakoff JS: Intrauterine insemination with husband's washed sperm. Fertil Steril 1986;46:470–475

    Google Scholar 

  4. Forrler A, Dellenbach P, Nisand I, Moreau L, Cranz CL, Clavert A, Rumpler Y: Direct intraperitoneal insemination in unexplained and cervical infertility. Lancet 1986;1:916–917

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hewitt J, Cohen J, Krishnaswamy V, Fehilly CB, Steptoe PC, Walters DE: Treatment of idiopathic infertility, cervical mucus hostility, and male infertility: Artificial insemination with husband's semen or in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril 1985;44:350–355

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moghissi KS: Some reflections on intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1986;46:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sunde A, Kahn J, Molne K: Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 1988;3:97–99

    Google Scholar 

  8. Studd J, Lim-Howe D, Dooley M, Savvas M: Direct intraperitoneal insemination. Lancet 1987;1:326

    Google Scholar 

  9. American Fertility Society: Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1985;43:351–353

    Google Scholar 

  10. Åbyholm T, Tanbo T, Dale PO, Kjekshus E, Magnus Ø: The first attempt at IVF treatment. Results and requirements for a satisfactory success rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990;38:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yovich JL, Blackledge DG, Richardson PA, Matson PL, Turner SR, Draper R: Pregnancies following pronuclear stage tubal transfer. Fertil Steril 1987;48:851–857

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henriksen T, Åbyholm T, Tanbo T, Magnus Ø: Pregnancies after intrafallopian transfer of embryos. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1988;5:296–298

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tanbo T, Dale PO, Åbyholm T: Assisted fertilization in infertile women with patent Fallopian tubes. A comparison of in-vitro fertilization, gamete intra-Fallopian transfer and tubal embryo stage transfer. Hum Reprod 1990;5:266–270

    Google Scholar 

  14. Welner S, DeCherney AH, Polan ML: Human menopausal gonadotropins: A justifiable therapy in ovulatory women with long-standing idiopathic infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;111–117

  15. Serhal PF, Katz M, Little V, Woronowski H: Unexplained infertility—the value of Pergonal superovulation combined with intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1988;49:602–606

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yovich JL, Matson PL: The treatment of infertility by the high intrauterine insemination of husband's washed spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1988;3:939–943

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaplan CR, Olive DL, Sabella V, Asch RH, Balmaceda JP, Riehl RM, Groff TR, Burns WN, Schenken RS: Gamete intrafallopian transfer vs superovulation with intrauterine insemination for the treatment of infertility. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1989;6:298–304

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sunde A, Kahn J, Molne K: Intrauterine insemination: A European collaborative report. Hum Reprod 1988;3(Suppl 2):69–73

    Google Scholar 

  19. Forrler A, Badoc E, Moreau L, Dellenbach P, Cranz CL, Clavert A, Rumpler Y: Direct intraperitoneal insemination: First results confirmed. Lancet 1986;2:1468

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hovatta O, Kurunmäki H, Tiitinen A, Lähteenmäki P, Koskimies AI: Direct intraperitoneal or intrauterine insemination and superovulation in infertility treatment: A randomized study. Fertil Steril 1990;54:339–341

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dodson WC, Whitesides DB, Hughes CL, Easley HA, Haney AF: Superovulation with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility: A possible alternative to gamete intrafallopian transfer and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1987;48:441–445

    Google Scholar 

  22. Crosignani PG, Ragni G, Finzi GCL, Lauretis LD, Olivares MD, Perotti L: Intraperitoneal insemination in the treatment of male and unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1991;55:333–337

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yovich JL, Matson PL: Pregnancy rate after high intrauterine insemination of husband's spermatozoa or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Lancet 1986;2:1287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Åbyholm, T., Tanbo, T., Dale, P.O. et al. In vivo fertilization procedures in infertile women with patent fallopian tubes: A comparison of gamete intrafallopian transfer, combined intrauterine and intraperitoneal insemination, and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation alone. J Assist Reprod Genet 9, 19–23 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204109

Key words

Navigation