Advertisement

The prognostic importance of the number of oocytes retrieved and estradiol levels in poor and normal responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment

  • Jehoshua Dor
  • Daniel S. Seidman
  • Izhar Ben-Shlomo
  • David Levran
  • Avraham Karasik
  • Shlomo Mashiach
Clinical Assisted Reproduction

Abstract

A low response to ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization poses a unique therapeutic challenge. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) have been suggested as a modality for treatment of this condition. In this study, we analyzed the results of 880 in vitro fertilization treatment cycles with respect to modality of ovarian stimulation, degree of hormonal response, and number of oocytes retrieved. In patients with estradiol (E 2 )levels less than 501 pg/ml on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration, 27% pregnancy rate was achieved with clomiphene citrate (CC) combined with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG), compared to 15.1% (P <0.005) with hMG alone and 20.8% (NS) with GnRHa and hMG. Pregnancy rates were not lower in these patients compared to patients with higher estradiol levels in the different stimulation protocols, but pregnancy rates were significantly lower in cycles during which three or fewer oocytes were retrieved, compared to those in which four or more oocytes were retrieved (10.8 vs 23.8%; P <0.0005). In low-retrieval cycles pregnancy rates actually decreased with increasing levels of estradiol. Our results indicate that the number of oocytes retrieved is a better prognostic parameter than E 2 levels in predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment and that GnRHa in the long protocol do not seem to be superior to CC combined with hMG for the treatment of poor responders.

Key words

poor responders ovarian stimulation in vitro fertilization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Trounson AD, Leeton JF, Wood C, Webb J, Wood J: Pregnancies in human by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in controlled ovulatory cycles. Science 1981;212:681–682Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crosignani PG, Ragni G, Lombroso GC, Scarduelli C, de Lauretis L, Caccamo A, Dalapra L, Cavion V, Cristiani C, Wyssling H, Olivares MD: IVF: Induction of ovulation in poor responders. J Steroid Biochem 1989;32:171–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones HW, Jr., Acosta A, Andrews MC, Garcia JE, Jones GS, Mantzavinos T, McDowll J, Sandow B, Veeck L, Whibley T, Wilkes C, Wright G: The importance of the follicular phase to success and failure in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1983;40:317–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muasher SJ: Stimulation protocols for patients with “atypical response.” In vitro fertilization and other assisted reproduction. NY Acad Sci 1988;541:82–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Rysselberge M, Puissant F, Barlow P, Lejeune B, Delvigne A, Leroy F: Fertility prognosis in IVF treatment of patients with cancelled cycles. Hum Reprod 1989;4:663–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tanbo T, Abyholm T, Bjoro T, Dale PO: Ovarian stimulation in previous failures from in-vitro fertilization: Distinction of two groups of poor responders. Hum Reprod 1990;5:811–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Belaisch-Allart J, Testart J, Frydman R: Utilization of GnRH agonists for poor responders in an IVF programme. Hum Reprod 1989;4:33–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Owen EJ, Davies MC, Kingsland CR, Jacobs HS, Mason BA: The use of a short regimen of buserelin, a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, and human menapausal gonadotrophin in assisted conception cycles. Hum Reprod 1989;4:749–753PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Howles CM, MacNamee MC, Edwards RG: Short term use of LHRH agonist to treat poor responders entering in vitro fertilization program. Hum Reprod 1987;2:655–656PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Serafin P, Stone B, Kerin J, Batzofin J, Quinn J, Marrs RD: An alternative approach to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in “poor responders.” Pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog. Fertil Steril 1988;49:90–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dor J, Ben Shlomo I, Lipitz S, Levran D, Eitchin A, Rudak E, Mashiach S: Ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue improves the in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy rate with both transvaginal and laparoscopic oocyte recovery. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1990;7:351–354Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dor J, Rudak E, Mashiach S, Nebel L, Serr DM, Goldman B: Periovulatory 17-beta estradiol changes and embryo morphologic features in conception and nonconceptional cycles after human in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986;45:63–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dulgi AM, Laufer N, Decherney AH, Maclusky NJ, Haseltine FP, Dolan ML, Mezer HC, Tarlatzis B, Naftolin F: The periovulatory and luteal phase of conception cycles following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1984;41:530–537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hackeloer BJ, Fleming R, Robinson HP: Correlation of ultrasonic and endocrinologic assessment of human follicular development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:122–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forman R, Fries N, Testart J, Belaisch-Allart J, Harout A, Frydman R: Evidence for an adverse effect of elevated serum estradiol concentration on embryo implantation. Fertil Steril 1988;49:118–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ben-Rafael Z, Bider D, Dan U, Zolti M, Levran D, Mashiach S: Combined gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotropin therapy (GnRH-a/hMG) in normal, high and poor responders to hMG. J Vitro Fert Embryo Trans 1991;8:33–36Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leyendecker G, Bernart W, Bremen TN, Beck H, Kunz G, Waibel S, Blum A, Stenger P, Kaplan-Reiterer H: Influence of the duration of the oestradiol rise on the success rate in GnRH analogue/hMG-stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 1990;5:52–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Testart J, Forman R, Belaisch-Allart J, Volante M, Hazout A, Strubb N, Frydman R: Embryo quality and uterine receptivity in in vitro fertilization cycles with or without agonists of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone. Hum Reprod 1989;4:198–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pellicer A, Ruiz A, Castellvi RM, Calatayud C, Ruiz M, Tarin JJ, Miro F, Bonilla-Musoles F: Is the retrieval of high numbers of oocytes desirable in patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) and gonadotrophins? Hum Reprod 1989;4:536–540PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jehoshua Dor
    • 1
  • Daniel S. Seidman
    • 1
  • Izhar Ben-Shlomo
    • 1
  • David Levran
    • 1
  • Avraham Karasik
    • 2
  • Shlomo Mashiach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel HashomerIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of EndocrinologyThe Chaim Sheba Medical CenterTel HashomerIsrael

Personalised recommendations