Abstract
A politicoeconomic model dealing with the interaction of private innovation and public regulation is presented. Causes and effects of this interdependence are investigated with special regard to the externalities which accompany innovations and make them into a partly public good. Our main hypothesis is that the collective character of inventive activity gives rise to synergetic effects. This hypothesis is supported by a microfoundation based on a nonlinear Markov process. Furthermore, the consequences of such synergetic innovation processes are examined: persistent disequilibrium, multiple equilibria, lock-in, path dependence, and chaos. Finally, some policy implications are derived concerning the effects of ageneral public promotion of innovations and of aselective industrial policy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RC (1983) Collective Invention. J Econ Behavior Organization 4:1–24
Arthur WB (1988) Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics. In: Anderson PW, Arrow KJ, Pines D (eds) The economy as an evolving complex system. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Eliasson G (1991) Deregulation, innovative entry and structural diversity as a source of stable and rapid economic growth. J Evol Econ 1:49–63
Foray D, Grübler A (1991) Morphological analysis, diffusion and patterns of technological evolution. In: Naki"cenovi"c N, Grübler A (eds) Diffusion of technologies and social behavior. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Freeman C, Perez C (1988) Structural crises of adjustment: business cycles and investment behaviour. In: Dosi G, et al. (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, London
Galeotti M, Gori F (1989) Uniqueness of periodic orbits in Lienard-type business-cycle models. Metroeconomica 40:135–146
Guckenheimer J, Holmes P (1990) Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Haag G, Weidlich W (1988) The migratory equations of motion. In: Weidlich W, Haag G (eds) Interregional migration. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Haken H (1987) Advanced Synergetics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value. Am Econ Rev 76:984–1001
Joskow PL, Rose NL (1989) The effects of economic regulation. In: Schmalensee R, Willig RD (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, vol 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Jovanovic B, Rob R (1989) The growth and diffusion of knowledge. Rev Econ Studies 56:569–582
Lee LW (1991) Entrepreneurship and regulation: dynamics and political economy. J Evol Econ 1:219–235
Nelson RR (1987) Understanding technical change as an evolutionary process. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Nelson RR (1990) What is public and what is private about technology? CCC working paper 90-9. Center for Research in Management, Berkeley
Noll RG (1989) Economic perspectives on the politics of regulation. In: Schmalensee R, Willig RD (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, vol 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Peltzman S (1976) Toward a more general theory of regulation. J Law Econ 19:211–240
Pohjola MT (1981) Stable, cyclic and chaotic growth: the dynamics of a discrete-time version of Goodwin's growth cycle model J Econ 41:27–38
Rogers TD, Whitley DC (1983) Chaos in the cubic mapping. Mathematical Modelling 4:9–25
Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Political Econ 98:S71-S102
Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schuster HG (1989) Deterministic chaos, 2nd edn. VCH, Weinheim
Silverberg G (1990) Adoption and diffusion of technology as a collective evolutionary process. In: Freeman C, Soete L (eds) New explorations in the economics of technical change. Pinter, London
Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Management Sci 2:3–21
Tollison RD (1991) Regulation and interest groups. In: High J (ed) Regulation: economic theory and history. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Verspagen B (1992) Endogenous innovation in neo-classical growth models: a survey. J Macroecon 14:631–662
von Hippel E (1988) The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Weidlich W, Braun M (1991) The master equation approach to nonlinear nonequilibrium economics. Paper presented at the EEA Conference 1991, Cambridge
Weidlich W, Haag G (1983) Concepts and models of a quantitative sociology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Weidlich W (1988) Solutions of the master equation. In: Weidlich W, Haag G (eds) Interregional migration. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
West BJ (1985) An essay on the importance of being nonlinear. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Woeckener B (1992) Zur Relevanz der Mastergleichung für die Modellierung ökonomischer Prozesse (On the relevance of the master equation approach to the modelling of economic processes). Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 210:412–426 (an English translation is available from the author)
Woeckener B (1993) Dynamische Marktprozesse bei Netzwerk-Externalitäten und begrenzter Rationalität (Dynamic market processes in the presence of network externalities and bounded rationality). In: Ott AE (ed) Probleme des unvollkommenen Wettbewerbs. Francke, Tübingen (an English translation is available from the author)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woeckener, B. Innovation, externalities, and the state: a synergetic approach. J Evol Econ 3, 225–248 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200869
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200869