Skip to main content
Log in

Catching up and falling behind, a vintage model approach

  • Global Economic Evolution: Knowledge Variety and Diffusion in Economic Growth and Development
  • III Catching up and Falling Behind in Economic Development
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on catching up suggests that due to diffusion and imitation, relatively backward countries should grow at a faster rate. A model along lines suggested by Abramovitz is constructed to examine this. A country's change in productivity (technological gap) is supposed to depend on the productivity gap itself (relatively backwardness), social capability of adopting new technology, and R&D-activity. Together with a vintage growth model, this set-up gives a lot of different possible explanations of why growth rates differ among nations. The possibilities of both catching up and falling behind are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovitz M (1986) Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. J Econ Hist 46: 385–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro R (1991) Economic growth in a cross sections of nations. Q J Econ 116: 407–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W (1986) Productivity growth, convergence and welfare. What the long-run data show. Am Econ Rev 76: 1072–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W, Levinthal D (1989) Innovation and Learning. The two faces of R&D. Econ J 99: 569–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall J (1977) Modern capitalism, its growth and transformation. Martin Bobertson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long J (1988) Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: comment. Am Econ Rev 78: 1138–1154

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowrick S, Ngyen D (1989) OECD comparative growth 1950–85: catch-up and convergence. Am Econ Rev 79: 1010–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg J (1988) Why growth rates differ. In: Dosi G et al: Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomulka S (1971) Inventive activity, diffusion and stages of economic growth. Mimeo Aarhus University

  • Johansen L (1959) Substitution versus fixed production coefficients in the theory of economic growth: a synthesis. Econometrica 27: 157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison A (1982) Phases of capitalist development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw G, Romer D, Weil D (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107: 407–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Phelps E (1966) Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev (Paper and Proceedings) 56: 69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen B (1991) A new empirical approach to catching up and falling behind. Struct Change Econ Dynam 2: 359–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff E (1991) Capital formation and productivity convergence over the long term. Am Econ Rev 81:565–579

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skonhoft, A. Catching up and falling behind, a vintage model approach. J Evol Econ 5, 285–295 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01198308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01198308

Key words

JEL-classification

Navigation