Abstract
In the course of 280 consecutive gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) attempts, supernumerary oocytes in excess of those transferred were inseminated in vitro. Pregnancy resulted in 31.1% of patients following the GIFT treatment. The overall in vitro fertilization (IVF) rate of supernumerary oocytes was significantly higher in those who became pregnant (41.2%) than in patients who did not (34.9%). However, the failure to fertilize any supernumerary oocytes was not significantly different between those becoming pregnant (27.6%) and those in whom the treatment failed (37.3%). Failure to fertilize any supernumerary oocytes in vitro was of a higher rate if suboptimal sperm preparation was used or if only one oocyte was left over for in vitro insemination following the GIFT treatment. We concluded that the in vitro fertilization rate was higher in the pregnant group, but the total failure to fertilize or the fertilization of any supernumerary oocytes does not predict the outcome of GIFT. Embryos resulting following fertilization of excess oocytes may be cryopreserved for subsequent use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Quigley MM, Sokoloski SE, Withers DM, Richards SL, Reis JM: Simultaneous in-vitro fertilisation and gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). Fertil Steril 1987;47:797–801
Quigley MM: Simultaneous GIFT and IVF (letter). Fertil Steril 1987;48:899
Fishel S, Faratian B, Webster J, Jackson P: Offering GIFT in an IVF unit (letter). Fertil Steril 1987;47:888–889
Asch RH: Offering GIFT in an IVF Unit (letter). Fertil Steril 1987;47:888
Matson PL, Yovich JM, Bootsma BD, Spittle SW, Yovich SL: The in-vitro fertilisation of supernumerary oocytes in a gamete intra-fallopian transfer programme. Fertil Steril 1987;47:802–806
Yovich JL, Yovich JM, Edirisinghe WR: Simultaneous GIFT and IVF (letter). Fertil Steril 1987;48:897–898
Ng SC, Wong PC, Hamilton M, Ratnam SS: Simultaneous gamete related techniques. Fertil Steril 1987;48:896–897
Braeckmans P, Devroey P, Camus M, Khan I, Staessen C, Smitz J, Van Waesberghe L, Wisanto A, Van Steitteghen AC: Gamete intra-fallopian transfer: Evaluation of 100 consecutive attempts. Hum Reprod 1987;2:201–205
Craft I, Ah-Moye M, Al-Shawaf T, Fiamanya W, Lewis P, Robertson D, Serhal P, Shrivastav P, Simons E, Brinsden P: Analysis of 1071 GIFT procedures — the case for flexible approach to treatment. Lancet 1988;1:1094–1098
Ah-Moye M. Craft I: The GIFT technique—a new fertility option? Practitioner 1988;232:67–72
Borrero C, Ord T, Balmaceda JP, Rojas FJ, Asch RH: The GIFT experience: an evaluation of the outcome of 115 cases. Hum Reprod 1988;3:227–230
Molloy D, Speirs A, du Plessis Y, McBain J, Johnson I: A laparoscopic approach to a programme of gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril 1987;47:289–294
Navat D, Muasher SJ, Oehninger S, Liu HC, Veek LL, Kreiner D, Rosenwaks Z: The value of in-vitro fertilisation for the treatment of unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1988;49:854–857
Leeton S, Hely D, Rogers P, Yeates C, Caro C: A controlled study between the use of gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT) and in-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer in the management of idiopathic and male infertility. Fertil Steril 1987;48:605–607
Wong PC, Ng SC, Hamilton MPR, Anandakumar C, Wong YC, Ratnam SS: Eighty consecutive cases of gamete intrafallopian transfer. Hum Reprod 1988;3:231–233
McKenna KM, McBain JC, Speirs AL, Jones G, Du Plessis Y, Johnstone WIH: The fate of supernumerary oocytes in gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) is not predictive of a poor outcome. The effects of oocyte selection. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1988;5:261–264
Gondolfi F, Moor RM: Stimulation of early embryonic development in the sheep by co-culture with oviduct epithelial cells. J Reprod Fert 1987;81:23–28
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Shawaf, T., Ah-Moye, M., Junk, S. et al. Fertilization of supernumerary oocytes following gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT): Correlation with outcome of GIFT treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 7, 98–102 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135582
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01135582