Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro fertilization (IVF) of mouse ova in HEPES-buffered culture media

  • Special Contributions
  • Published:
Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some major drawbacks of a bicarbonate-buffered culture medium include the requirement of an elaborate incubator system able to maintain a 5% CO2 environment and the inability of the culture medium to maintain a physiological pH range (pH 7.3–7.4) in room air (0.03% CO2). This work resulted in the development of IVF culture media, BB (modified T6) and Hams-HEPES, which use HEPES-buffered systems not requiring the specialized CO2 environment to maintain a physiological pH range in room air. These media generate above-average cleavage rates in in vitro fertilized, superovulated B6CBAF1 mice ova. The effect of heparin and HEPES on cleavage was studied and neither had a significant effect at the concentrations used. Cleavage rates of nonfertilized ova (parthenogenic division) were 9 to 13%. There was no significant difference in parthenogenesis between any of the culture media and it appears to be a function of the strain of mice and the timing between human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection and ovum collection. These results emphasize the need to account for parthenogenesis when determining cleavage rates of in vitro fertilized mouse ova. Also, the results suggest that because of individual mouse differences in cleavage rates, it is important to use an adequate number of mice per group to determine an accurate, average cleavage rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerman S, Swanson R: In vitro fertilization and preimplantation of embryo development in mice. Infertility 1983;6:293–298

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowman CM, Berger EM, Butler EN, Toth KM, Repine JE: HEPES may stimulate culture endothelial cells to make growth-retarding oxygen metabolites. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1985;21:140–142

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edirisinghe WR, Law HY, Ng SC, Chia CM, Ratnam, SS: Superovulation of mice with human menopausal gonadotropin or pure follicle-stimulating hormone in combination with human chorionic gonadotropin and the effects of oocyte aging on in vitro fertilization. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986;3:314–318

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards RG, Fishel SB, Cohen J, et al.: Factors influencing the success of in vitro for alleviating human infertility. In Vitro Fertil 1984;1:3

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gates AH: Maximizing yield and developmental uniformity of eggs.In Methods of Mammalian Embryology, JC Danel Jr (ed). San Francisco, Freeman, 1971, pp 64–75

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman MH:In Early Mammalian Development: Parthenogenic Studies, Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp 1–28

  7. Lee MA, Storey BT: Bicarbonate is essential for fertilization of mouse eggs: Mouse sperm require it to undergo the acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 1986;34:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mahadevan MM, Fleetham J, Church RB, Taylor FJ: Growth of mouse embryos in bicarbonate media buffered by carbon dioxide, Hepes or phosphate. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986;3:304–307

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mahadevan MM: Personal communication, 1987

  10. Quinn P: Personal communication

  11. Sher G, Knutzen V, Stratton CJ, Montakhab MM, Allenson SG, Mayville J, Rubenstein JA, Glass MJ, Bilach SM: The development of a non-university based ambulatory in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer program: Phase 1. Fertil Steril 1984;41:4:511–518

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan PC, Ferris AL, Storrie B: Effects of temperature, pH elevators, and energy production inhibitors on horseradish peroxidase transport through endocytotic vessicles. J Cell Physiol 1987;131:58–63

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trounson A, Peura A, Kirby C: Ultrarapid freezing: a new low-cost and effective method of embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 1987;48:5:843–850

    Google Scholar 

  14. Whittingham DG: Fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. Nature 1968;220:592–593

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zigler JS Jr, Lepe-Zuniga JL, Vistica B, Gery I: Analysis of the cytotoxic effects of light-exposed HEPES-containing culture medium. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1985;21:282–287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Behr, B.R., Stratton, C.J., Foote, W.D. et al. In vitro fertilization (IVF) of mouse ova in HEPES-buffered culture media. J Assist Reprod Genet 7, 9–15 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01133877

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01133877

Key Words

Navigation