Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of the urinary hemagglutination test (Higonavis) and enzyme immunoassay (Ovustick) in detection of the spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge in an in vitro fertilization/gamete intrafallopian transfer (IVF/GIFT) program

  • Special Contributions
  • Published:
Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fifty-eight treatment cycles in an in vitro fertilization/gamete intrafallopian transfer (IVF/GIFT) program were studied to compare the efficacy of two urinary methods, hemagglutination test (Higonavis) and enzyme immunoassay (Ovustick), in detection of spontaneous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. If an isolated rise in urinary LH level was taken as indicative of LH surge, the false-positive rate was 36.7% for Higonavis and 10.2% for Ovustick. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). If only a sustained rise in urinary LH was taken to indicate LH surge, the false-positive rate was 6.1% for Higonavis and 0% for Ovustick. In the seven cycles with a spontaneous plasma LH surge, there was a positive correlation between the plasma LH levels and the two urinary assay methods in six cycles (85.7%). Compared to plasma LH, there was a mean delay of 17.4 hr by the Higonavis test and 15.6 hr by the Ovustick test. If a sustained rise in urinary LH levels was taken as indicative of LH surge, both methods are quite accurate but the Ovustick appeared to be more specific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blackwell RE: Detection of ovulation. Fertil Steril 1984; 41(5):680–681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baird DT: Prediction of ovulation: Biophysical, physiological and biochemical coordinates.In Ovulation: Methods for Its Prediction and Detection, SL Jeffcoate (ed). New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1983, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  3. Trounson AO, Burger HG, Kovac GT: Prediction of ovulation for in vitro fertilization.In Ovulation: Methods for Its Prediction and Detection, SL Jeffcoate (ed). New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1983, pp 83–102

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tamada T: LH determination in unconcentrated urine by a hemagglutination test. Acta Obstet Gynecol Jap 1976;23(1):27–31

    Google Scholar 

  5. Varma TR, Patel RH, Everard D: Determination with Higonavis of luteinizing hormone levels in urine compared with those in plasma. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1982;89:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  6. Varma TR, Patel RH, Everard D: The correlation between LH, FSH, estradiol, progesterone, prolactin level and vaginal cytology at midcycle. Int J Fertil 1983;28(4):243–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho PC, Kwan M, Chan SYW, ChanPH, Tang LCH: Rapid urinary LH assay for prediction of ovulation. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1985;25:230–232

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baker HWG, Bangah ML, Burger HG, Kovacs GT, Summerbell D, Warnes GM: Timing of ovulation by determination of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge with an enzyme-linked monoclonal antibody dipstick (Ovustick). Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1986;26:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez F, Trounson A, Besanko M: Detection of the LH surge for AID, AIH and embryo transfer using a twice daily urinary dipstick assay. Clin Reprod Fertil 1986;4:45–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vermeck M, Kletzky OA, Davajan V, Israel R: Monitoring techniques to predict and detect ovulation. Fertil Steril 1987;47:259–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Veeck LL, Wortham JWE Jr, Witmyer J, Sandow BA, Acosta AA, Garcia JE, Jones GS, Jones HW Jr: Maturation and fertilization of morphologically immature human oocytes in a program of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1983;39:594–602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffcoate SL: Use of rapid hormone assays in the prediction of ovulation.In Ovulation: Methods for Its Prediction and Detection, SL Jeffcoate (ed). New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1983, pp 67–82

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taymor ML, Seibel MM, Smith D, Levesque L: Ovulation timing by luteinizing hormone assay and follicle puncture. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:191–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frydman R, Testart J, Feinstein MC,Roger M: Interrelationship of plasma and urinary luteinizing hormone preovulatory surge. J Steroid Biochem 1984;20:617–619

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dyahabakhch O, Templeton AA, Hobson BM, McNeilly AS: Prediction of ovulation by measurement of luteinizing hormone. Lancet 1980; :1199–1200

  16. Garcia JE, Jones GS, Wright GL: Prediction of the time of ovulation. Fertil Steril 1981;36:308–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, Y.F., Ho, P.C., So, W.W.K. et al. Efficacy of the urinary hemagglutination test (Higonavis) and enzyme immunoassay (Ovustick) in detection of the spontaneous luteinizing hormone surge in an in vitro fertilization/gamete intrafallopian transfer (IVF/GIFT) program. J Assist Reprod Genet 6, 218–221 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132868

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132868

Key Words

Navigation