Skip to main content
Log in

Use of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer to circumvent infertility caused by an inherited imperforate vagina in mice

  • Special Contributions
  • Published:
Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An autosomal recessive mutation (ipv) causing infertility in homozygous females (ipv/ipv) because of imperforate vaginae was discovered in a line of mice selected for low lean tissue mass as a proportion of body weight. The aim of this study was to determine if the mutation could be propagated in offspring following embryo transfer of oocytes collected from mutant females and fertilized in vitro with sperm from males known to carry the gene (ipv/?). Caudal epididymal sperm were incubated with cumulus-enclosed oocytes for 8–10 hr in tissue culture medium 199+5% fetal calf serum +0.4% bovine serum albumin. Oocytes possessing at least two pronuclei were transferred to recipient CD-1 females which had been mated 24 hr earlier to vasectomized males. A total of 683 oocytes was collected from 27 superovulated mutant females. A large proportion of the oocytes was abnormal as evidenced by cytoplasmic fragmentation (259/683, 38%). Seventy-eight percent (331/424) of the normal oocytes were fertilized and 181 of these were transferred to 10 recipients. Six of 10 recipients delivered 38 offspring (24 females, 14 males). Fifty-eight percent (14/24) of the female offspring displayed an imperforate vagina. The results demonstrate that in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer can be used for propagating a mutant gene that causes infertility in females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisen EJ, Hauser ME, Pomp D, Anderson SG, Newbold RR, McCormick GY: A recessive mutation causing imperforate vagina in mice. J Hered 1989;80:478–482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gowen JW, Heidenthal G: Imperforate in the mouse, its inheritance and relation to endocrine function. J Exp Zool 1942;89:433–450

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chase EB: Inheritance of imperforate vagina in the mouse. J Hered 1954;35:363–364.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Strong LC, Hollander WF: Heredity loop-tail in the house mouse. J Hered 1949;40:329–334

    Google Scholar 

  5. Searle AG: The genetics and morphology of two “luxoid” mutants in the house mouse. Genet Res Camb 1964;5:171–197

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards RG, Steptoe PC, Purdy JM: Establishing full-term human pregnancies using cleaving embryosin vitro. Br J Obstet Gyn 1980;87:737–741

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trounson AO, Leeton JF, Wood C, Webb J, Wood J: Pregnancies in humans by fertilizationin vitro and embryo transfer in the controlled ovulatory cycle. Science 1981;212:681–682

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eisen EJ: Selection for components related to body composition in mice: Direct responses. Theor Appl Genet 1987;74:393–801

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chang MC: Fertilization of rabbit ovain vitro. Nature 1959;184:466–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hewitt J, Cohen J, Krishnaswamy V, Fehilly CB, Steptoe BC, Walters DE: Treatment of idiopathic infertility, cervical mucus hostility and male infertility: Artificial insemination with husband's semen orin vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril 1985;44:350–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sirard MA, Lambert RD, Menard DP, Bedoya M: Pregnancies afterin-vitro fertilization of cow follicular oocytes, their incubation in rabbit oviduct and their transfer to the cow uterus. J Reprod Fert 1985;75:551–556

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miyamoto H, Chang MC: Fertilizationin vitro of mouse and hamster eggs after the removal of follicular cells. J Reprod Fert 1972;30:309–312

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fraser LR, Drury LM: Effect of removal of epididymal secretions on fertilizationin vitro of mouse eggs. J Reprod Fert 1976;48:125–128

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leipold HW, Saperstein G: Rectal and vaginal constriction in Jersey cattle. JAVMA 1975;166:231–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deas DW, Melrose DR, Reed HCB, Van de Plassche M, Pidduck H: Other non-infectious abnormalities.In Fertility and Infertility in Domestic Animals, JA Laing (ed). London, Bailliere Tindall, 1979, pp 137–159

    Google Scholar 

  16. Finocchio EJ, Hales WS, Wolfe DL: Persistent median wall of the mullerian duct system in a two-year old filly. Vet Med 1968;63:622

    Google Scholar 

  17. Teige J: Congenital malformations of the Mullerian ducts and sinus urogenitalis in pigs. Nord Vet Med 1957;9:609–629

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barbolt TA, Brown GL: Vaginal septum in the rat. Lab Anim 1989;18:47–48

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cunliffe-Beamer TL, Feldman DB: Vaginal septa in mice: Incidence, inheritance and effect on reproduction performance. Lab Anim Sci 1976;26:895–898

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shire JGM: Studies on the inheritance of vaginal septa in mice, a trait with low penetrance. J Reprod Fert 1984;70:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stephens FD: The Mayer-Rokitansky syndrome. J Urol 1986;135:109–113

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bonner JT: Vaginal septa frequence influenced by major histocompatability complex, H-2. J Immunogenet 1981;8:455–458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Didion, B.A., Hauser, M.E. & Eisen, E.J. Use of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer to circumvent infertility caused by an inherited imperforate vagina in mice. J Assist Reprod Genet 8, 167–172 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131709

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131709

Key Words

Navigation