Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of male-factor semen samples prior to insemination and in vitro fertilization

  • Special Contributions
  • Published:
Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Semen analyses carried out as part of the clinical in vitro fertilization or intrauterine insemination protocols provide important information that determine the type of clinical treatment of the male partner and the sperm processing method. It is postulated that the sperm of male-factor patients cannot survive hypoosmotic stress conditions because of defective sperm membrane function. To test this, 0.1 ml of semen from each of 102 patients was placed in 1.0 ml of 150 mosmolliter eosin citrate fructose solution and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. The percentage viability of the sperm cells was then determined. The results indicated that patients with two or more abnormal semen parameters had a significantly lower percentage viability while in the hypoosmotic solution (40.6±4.7%), in contrast to non-male-factor patients (69.0±1.6%). Donor sperm (N=32) serving as controls (73.3±2.1%) had a viability in hypoosmotic solution similar to that of non-male-factor patients. The data suggest that sperm of male-factor patients are less able to survive the hypoosmotic stress conditions as shown by the percentage viability in hypoosmotic solution and emphasize the impertance of using less stressful sperm processing methods for in vitro fertilization or insemination in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jeyendram RS, Van der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJD: Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fert 1984;70:219, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parikh FR, Lavy G, DeCherney AH: The hypoosmotic swelling test as a predictor of in vitro fertilization outcome.In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Society for Gynecological Investigation, San Diego, Calif, 1989, p 321, abstr 479

  3. World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Fertility Society: New guidelines for the use of semen-donor insemination: 1986. Fertil Steril 1986;46: Suppl 2

  5. Eliasson R: Supravital staining of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1977;28:1257

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chan PJ, Henig I, Tredway DR, Prough SG: Simplified method for evaluating sperm hyperactivation based on dilution effect versus washed sperm method. J Androl 1989; 10:30P

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zaneveld LJD, Jeyendran RS, Ktakeski P, Coetzee K, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ: Hypoosmotic swelling test.In Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction, AA Acosta, RJ Swanson, SB Ackerman, TF Kruger, JA van Zyl, R Menkveld (eds.) Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1990, p 223

    Google Scholar 

  8. Makler A, Murillo O, Huszar G, Tarlatzis B, DeCherney A, Naftolin F: Improved techniques for separating motile spermatozoa from human semen. II. An atraumatic centrifugation method. Int J Androl 1984;7:71

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chan SYW, Fox EJ, Chan MMC, Tsoi W, Tang LCM, Tang GWK, Ho P: The relationship between the human sperm hypoosmotic swelling test, routine semen analysis, and the human zona-free hamster ovum penetration test. Fertil Steril 1985;44:668

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, P.J., Tredway, D.R., Su, B.C. et al. Identification of male-factor semen samples prior to insemination and in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 8, 37–40 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131589

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131589

Key Words

Navigation