Skip to main content
Log in

A user model neural network for a personal news service

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

User modelling has been widely applied to pedantic situations, where we are attempting to infer the user's knowledge. In teaching it is important to know that the user has mastered the elementary concepts before proceeding with the advanced topics. However, the application of user modelling to information retrieval demands a quite different type of user model. Here we construct a user model for browsing, where the user is uncertain of exactly which information he desires. This requires a more inexact and robust user model, that can quickly give guidance to the system. We propose a user model based on neural networks that can be constructed incrementally. Performance of the model shows some promise for this approach. We discuss the advantages and limitations of the approach and its implications for user modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R. B.: 1990, ‘User Models: Theory, Method, and Practice’.Int. J. Man-Machine Studies,32, 511–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baclaski, P. W.: 1991, ‘Personal Information Intake Filtering’. In:Proceedings of the Bellcore Information Filtering Workshop, pp. 1–14.

  • Blair, D. C.: 1986, ‘Indeterminacy in the Subject Access to Documents’.Information Processing and Management,22, 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair D. C. and M. E. Moran: 1985, ‘An Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness for a Full-text Document Retrieval System’.Communications of the ACM,28(3), 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brajnik G., G. Guida and C. Tasso: 1987, ‘User Modelling in Intelligent Information Retrieval’.Information Processing and Management,23(4), 305–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brajnik G., C. Tasso and A. Vaccher: 1991, ‘A Shell for Non-monotonic User Modelling Systems’. In:Proceedings of the IJCA1 Workshop on Agent Modelling for Intelligent Interaction, Sydney.

  • Chen H. and V. Dhar: 1990, ‘User Misconceptions of Information Retrieval Systems’.Int. J. Man-Machine Studies,32, 673–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels P. J.: 1986, ‘Cognitive Models in Information Retrieval — An Evaluative Review’.Journal of Documentation,42(4), 272–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deerwester S., S. T. Dumais, G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer and R. Harshman: 1990, ‘Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis’.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,41(6), 391–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eirund H.: 1989, ‘Knowledge-based Document Classification Supporting Content Based Retrieval and Mail Distribution’. In: K. Boyanov and R. Angelinov (eds.):Network Information Processing Systems, Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 309–320.

  • Foltz P. W.: 1990, ‘Using Latent Semantic Indexing for Information Filtering’. In:Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Office Information Systems, pp. 40–47.

  • Fox E. A.: 1988, ‘Development of the Coder System: A Testbed for Artificial Intelligence Methods in Information Retrieval’.Information Processing and Management,23(4), 341–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei H. P. and P. Schauble: 1991, ‘Determining the Effectiveness of Retrieval Algorithms’.Information Processing and Management,27(2/3), 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnas G. W., T. K. Landauer, L. M. Gomez and S. T. Dumais: 1987, ‘The Vocabulary Problem in Human-system Communication’.Communications of the ACM,30(11), 964–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez L. M. and C. C. Lochbaum: 1990, ‘All the Right Words: Finding What you Want as a Function of Richness of Indexing Vocabulary’.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,41(8), 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon M.: 1988, ‘Probabilistic and Genetic Algorithms for Document Retrieval’.Communications of the ACM,31(10), 1208–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon M. and M. Kochen: 1989, ‘Recall-precision Trade-off: A Derivation’.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,40(3), 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman D.: 1986, ‘An Experimental Study of Factors Important in Document Ranking’. In:Proc. ACM Conference on R&D in Information Retrieval, Pisa, Italy.

  • Howells T.: 1988, ‘Vital: A Connectionist Parser’. In:Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Montreal, Canada.

  • Jones W. and G. W. Furnas: 1987, ‘Pictures of Relevance: A Geometric Analysis of Similarity Measures’.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,38(6), 420–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones W. P.: 1988, ‘As we May Think: Psychological Considerations in the Design of a Personal Filing System’. In:Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanou Y., Matsumoto, T. and Nakamura, Y.: 1990, ‘A User Model Representing Multiple Requests for an Intelligent Document Retrieval System’. SIG-HICG-8902-110/4, Japanese Information Processing Society.

  • Mozer M.: 1984, ‘Inductive Information Retrieval Using Parallel Distributed Computation’, ICS, UCSD.

  • Oddy R. N.: 1977, ‘Information Retrieval Through Man-machine Dialogue’.Journal of Documentation,33(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwant J.: 1991, ‘The Doppelganger User Modelling System’.Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Agent Modelling Sydney, Australia, pp. 164–168.

  • Raghavan V. V. and J. S. Deogun: 1987, ‘Optimal Determination of User-oriented Clusters’. In:Proc. 10th Annual Conference on R&D in Information Retrieval, pp. 140–146, New Orleans, USA.

  • Rich E.: 1983, ‘Users are Individuals: Individualizing User Models’.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,18, 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton G.: 1986, ‘Another Look at Automatic Text-retrieval Systems’.Communications of the ACM,29(7), 648–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton G. and C. Buckley: 1991, ‘Global Text Matching for Information Retrieval’.Science,253(5023), 1012–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparck Jones K.: 1972, ‘A Statistical Interpretation of Term Specificity and its Applications in Retrieval’.Journal of Documentation,28, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R. H. and W. B. Croft: 1989, ‘Support for Browsing in an Intelligent Text Retrieval System’.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,30, 639–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijsbergen C. J.: 1977, ‘A Theoretical Basis for the Use of Co-occurrence Data in Information Retrieval’.Journal of Documentation,33(2), 106–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigil P.J.: 1983, ‘The Psychology of Online Searching’.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,34(4), 281–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson R. and P. Kingston: 1991, ‘Using the Cosine Measure in a Neural Network for Information Retrieval’. In:Proceedings of the 14th Conference on R&D in Information Retrieval, Chicago, USA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jennings, A., Higuchi, H. A user model neural network for a personal news service. User Model User-Adap Inter 3, 1–25 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099423

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099423

Key words

Navigation