Abstract
The usual formula for transition probabilities in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is generalized to yield conditional probabilities for selected sequences of events at several different times, called “consistent histories,” through a criterion which ensures that, within limits which are explicitly defined within the formalism, classical rules for probabilities are satisfied. The interpretive scheme which results is applicable to closed (isolated) quantum systems, is explicitly independent of the sense of time (i.e., past and future can be interchanged), has no need for wave function “collapse,” makes no reference to processes of measurement (though it can be used to analyze such processes), and can be applied to sequences of microscopic or macroscopic events, or both, as long as the mathematical condition of consistency is satisfied. When applied to appropriate macroscopic events it appears to yield the same answers as other interpretative schemes for standard quantum mechanics, though from a different point of view which avoids the conceptual difficulties which are sometimes thought to require reference to conscious observers or classical apparatus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1955), translated fromMathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47:777 (1935).
M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974).
E. P. Wigner,Am. J. Phys. 31:6 (1963).
F. London and E. Bauer,La Theorie de l'Observation en Mécanique Quantique (Hermann, Paris, 1939).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Quantum Mechanics:Non-Relativistic Theory (Pergamon Press, London, 1958).
A. Messiah,Mécanique Quantique (Dunod, Paris, 1965); English translation:Quantum Mechanics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970).
L. I. Schiff,Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
Y. Aharonov, P. G. Bergmann, and J. L. Lebowitz,Phys. Rev. 134:B1410 (1964).
K. Gottfried,Quantum Mechanics. Vol. I:Fundamentals (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1966), Chap. IV.
M. Cini,Nuovo Cim. 73B:27 (1983); M. Ciniet al., Found. Phys. 9:479 (1979).
P. A. Moldauer,Phys. Rev. D 5:1028 (1972).
H. Everett III,Rev. Mod. Phys. 29:454 (1957); B. S. DeWitt inBattelle Rencontres:1967Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, C. M. DeWitt and J. A. Wheeler, eds. (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1968); B. S. DeWitt and N. Graham, eds.,The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1973).
L. E. Ballentine,Found. Phys. 3:229 (1973).
P. Benioff,Found. Phys. 8:709 (1978).
W. Feller,An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, 3rd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Griffiths, R.B. Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. J Stat Phys 36, 219–272 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015734
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015734