Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coefficient problem for univalent functions with quasiconformal extension

  • Published:
Siberian Mathematical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. L. de Branges, “A proof of the Biebebach conjecture,” Acta Math.,154, No. 1–2, 137–152 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Kühnau and W. Niske, “Abschätzung des dritten Koeffizienten bei quasikonform fortsetzbaren schlichten Funktionen der Klasse S,” Math. Nach.,78, 185–192 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. L. Krushkal', “On the problem of the coefficients for univalent functions with a quasiconformal continuation,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,287, No. 3, 547–550 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. L. Krushkal', “Certain extremal problems for univalent analytic functions,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,182, No. 4, 754–757 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Kuhnau, “Verzerrungssätze und Koeffizientenbedingungen vom Grunskyschen Typ für quasikonforme Abbildungen,” Math. Nachr.,48, No. 1–6, 77–105 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. Lehto, “Quasiconformal mappings and singular integrals,” in: Symposia Math., Vol. 18, Academic Press, London (1976), pp. 429–453.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. L. Krushkal', “Asymptotic estimates and properties of univalent functions with quasiconformal continuation,” Sib. Mat. Zh.,24, No. 3, 112–118 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Kühnau and J. Timmel, “Asymptotische Koeffizientenabschätzungen für die quasikonform fortsetzbaren Abbildungen der Klasse S bzw. Σ,” Math. Nachr.,91, 357–362 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. L. Krushkal', “Applications of multidimensional complex analysis to geometric function theory,” in: Complex Analysis and Applications (Proc. Internat. Conf. on Complex Analysis and Applications, Varna, 1983), Sofia (1985), pp. 133–140.

  10. H. L. Royden, “Automorphisms and isometries of Teichmuller spaces,” in: Advances in the Theory of Riemann Surfaces, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (1971), pp. 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. J. Earle and I. Kra, “On sections of some holomorphic families of closed Riemann surfaces,” Acta Math.,137, 49–79 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. A. Hummel, “The Grunsky coefficients of a schlicht function,” Proc. Am. Math. Soc.,15, No. 1, 142–150 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. L. Krushkal' and R. Kyunau (R. Kühnau), Quasiconformal Mappings: New Methods and Applications [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. S. Hamilton, “Extremal quasiconformal mappings with prescribed boundary values,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,138, 399–406 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. J. Earle, “On holomorphic cross sections in Teichmuller spaces,” Duke Math. J.,36, No. 2, 409–415 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. L. Krushkal', Quasiconformal Mappings and Riemann Surfaces, Winston & Sons, Washington (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Gogturk, “Estimates for univalent functions with quasiconformal extensions,” Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. AI, No. 589 1–21 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. S. L. Krushkal'
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Novosibirsk. Translated from Sibirskii Matematicheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 105–115, July–August, 1987.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krushkal', S.L. Coefficient problem for univalent functions with quasiconformal extension. Sib Math J 28, 599–608 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973849

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973849

Keywords

Search

Navigation