Skip to main content
Log in

Conditions for well-posedness in the Hadamard sense in spaces of generalized functions

  • Published:
Siberian Mathematical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

We make some remarks in connection with the results of Secs. 6–10.

  1. 1.

    We have used expansions into orthogonal series. In the general case it is natural to use spectral expansions of linear selfadjoint operators. For this one may use the results of [13, 14].

  2. 2.

    Can the concept of weak well-posedness be carried over to nonlinear problems? Here, probably, J. F. Colombeau's method will turn out to be useful (see [13, 14]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. S. L. Sobolev, “Methode nouvelle a resoudre le probleme de Cauchy pour les equations lineaires hyperboliques normales,” Mat. Sb.,1 (43), 39–72 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. N. Tikhonov and V. Ya. Arsenin, Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems, Wiley, New York (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. M. Lavrent'ev, Conditionally Well-Posed Problems for Differential Equations [in Russian], Novosibirsk State Univ. (1973).

  4. V. P. Maslov, “The existence of a solution of an ill-posed problem is equivalent to the convergence of a regularization process,” Usp. Mat. Nauk,23, No. 3, 183–184 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. H. Zemanian, Generalized Integral Transformations, Interscience, New York (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. N. Mil'shtein, “The extension of semigroups of operators in locally convex spaces,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Mat., No. 2, 91–95 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. de Graaf, “A theory of generalized functions based on holomorphic semigroups,” Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc., A:86A, No. 4, 407–420 (1983); B:87A, No. 2, 155–171 (1984); C:87A, No. 2, 173–187 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Pilipovic, “Generalization of Zemanian spaces of generalized functions which have orthonormal series expansions,” SIAM J. Math. Anal.,17, No. 2, 477–484 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Wrobel, “Generating Frechet-Montel spaces that are not Schwartz by closed linear operators,” Arch. Math. (Basel),46, No. 3, 257–260 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Szaz, “Periodic generalized functions,” Publ. Math. Debrecen,25, No. 3–4, 229–235 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Szaz, “Generalized periodic distributions,” Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl.,23, No. 10, 1577–1582 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu. A. Dubinskii, “The algebra of pseudodifferential operators with analytic symbols and its applications to mathematical physics,” Usp. Mat. Nauk,37, No. 5, 97–137 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. M. Gel'fand and A. K. Kostyuchenko, “Expansion in eigenfunctions of differential and other operators,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,103, No. 3, 349–352 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. M. Gel'fand and G. E. Shilov, Generalized Functions. Vol. 3: Theory of Differential Equations, Academic Press, New York (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. F. Colombeau, “A multiplication of distributions,” J. Math. Anal. Appl.,94, No. 1, 96–115 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. F. Colombeau, Elementary Introduction to New Generalized Functions, North-Holland Math. Studies, Vol. 113, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Sverdlovsk. Translated from Sibirskii Matematicheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 53–59, November–December, 1987.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivanov, V.K. Conditions for well-posedness in the Hadamard sense in spaces of generalized functions. Sib Math J 28, 906–911 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00969468

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00969468

Keywords

Navigation