Skip to main content
Log in

5-Fluorouracil vs. epirubicin vs. 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin in advanced gastric carcinoma

  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From January, 1985, through January, 1987, 165 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomized to receive epirubicin (E) alone (90 mg/m2 day 1), 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) alone (500 mg/m2 days 1–5), or the combination of E (90 mg/m2 day 1) and 5-FU (400 mg/m2 days 1–5). Courses were repeated every four weeks. Patients were stratified by extent (locally advanced vs. metastatic), evaluability (measurable vs. non-measurable) and by history of prior radiotherapy (yes vs. no). Randomization to single arm epirubicin was stopped after 26 patients were enrolled. Objective responses occurred in only 1/16 (6%) of the patients treated with E alone, 1/40 (5%) with 5-FU alone and 4/33 (12%) with both 5-FU and E. There were no significant differences in all eligible patients with respect to time to progression or overall survival in the three treatment arms. Toxicity was primarily hematologic and more pronounced in the combination arm. Neither 5-FU alone, epirubicin alone, or the combination have a major impact in the treatment of gastric carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T: Cancer Statistics, 1992. Ca 42:19–38, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  2. MacDonald JS, Gohmann JJ: Chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer: present status, future prospects. Sem Oncol 15:42–49, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  3. O'Connell MJ: Current status of chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic and gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 3:1032–1039, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cerosimo RJ, Hong WK: Epirubicin: A review of the pharmacology, clinical activity, and adverse effects of an adriamycin analogue. J Clin Oncol 4:425–439, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  5. Scarffe JH, Kenny JB, Johnson RJ,et al: Phase II trial of epirubicin in gastric cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 69:1275–1277, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolaric K, Roth A, Potrebica V,et al: 4′ epi-doxorubicin + 5-fluorouracil vs. 5-fluorouracil alone in advanced gastric cancer — preliminary report of a phase II controlled clinical trial. International Symposium on Advances in Anthracycline Chemotherapy. Milan, Italy, p. 29, 1984 (abstract)

  7. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group: Triazinate and platinum efficacy in combination with 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin: Results of a three arm randomized trial in metastatic gastric cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 80:1011–1015, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Fleming TR,et al: A comparison of chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma. JAMA 253:2061–2067, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chjewbowski RT, Paroly WS, Pugh RP,et al: Treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma with 5-fluorouracil: A randomized comparison of two routes of delivery. Cancer Treat Rep 63:1979–1981, 1979

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loehrer, P.J., Harry, D. & Chlebowski, R.T. 5-Fluorouracil vs. epirubicin vs. 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin in advanced gastric carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 12, 57–63 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873238

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873238

Keywords

Navigation