Skip to main content
Log in

Head-injured subjects aged over 50 years: correlations between variables of trauma and neuropsychologial follow-up

  • Original Communications
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Neuropsychological follow-up was studied in 70 consecutive head-injured subjects aged over 50 years. Diffuse deterioration (28%), moderate deterioration (25%) and dementia (21%) were the most frequent sequelae. Analysis of correlations between neuropsychological sequelae and trauma variables showed that: (1) mild trauma did not necessarily imply good prognosis and could be followed by very severe consequences; (2) duration of post-traumatic amnesia was correlated with coma duration but not with neuropsychological out come; (3) on the whole, no prognostic predictor of the outcome was found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agresti A (1984) Analysis of ordinal categorial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennet-Levy JM (1984) Long-term effects of severe head injury on memory: evidence from a consecutive series of young adults. Acta Neurol Scand 70:285–298

    Google Scholar 

  3. Binder LM (1986) Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: a review of the post-concussive syndrome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 8:323–346

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks DN (1972) Memory and head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis 155:350–355

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks DN (1974) Recognition memory after head injury: a signal detection analysis. Cortex 10:224–230

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks DN (1975) Long and short-term memory in head injury patients. Cortex 11:329–340

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks DN (1976) Wechsler Memory Scale performance and its relationship to brain damage after severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 39:593–601

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks DN, Hosie J, Bond RM, Jennett B, Aughton M (1986) Cognitive sequelae of severe head injury in relation to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:549–553

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinley W (1986) The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: a relative's view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:764–770

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carlsson CA, Von Essen C, Lofgren J (1968) Factors affecting the clinical course of patients with severe head injuries. J Neurosurg 29:242–250

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chadwick O, Rutter M, Brown G, Shaffer D, Traub M (1981) A prospective study of children with head injuries. II. Cognitive sequelae. Psychol Med 11:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  12. DeRenzi E, Nichelli P (1975) Verbal and non-verbal short term memory impairment following hemispheric damage. Cortex 11:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Renzi E, Vignolo LA (1962) The token test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasia. Brain 85:665–678

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dikmen S, Temkin N, McLean A, Wyler A, Machamer J (1987) Memory and head injury severity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:1613–1618

    Google Scholar 

  15. Everitt BS (1977) The analysis of contingency tables. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hannay HJ, Levin HS, Grossman RG (1979) Impaired recognition memory after head injury. Cortex 15:269–283

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heiskanen O, Sipponen P (1970) Prognosis of severe brain injury. Acta Neurol Scand 46:343–348

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jennet B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet I: 480–484

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jennet B, Teasdale G (1981) Prognosis after severe head injury. In: Jennet B, Teasdale G (eds) Management of head injuries. Davis, Philadelphia, pp 317–332

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jennet B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, Minderhoud J, KnillJones R (1976) Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury. Lancet 1:1031–1034

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levati A, Farina ML, Vecchi G, Rossanda M, Marrubini MB (1982) Prognosis of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 57:779–783

    Google Scholar 

  22. Levin HS, Grossman RG, Rose JE, Teasdale G (1979) Longterm neuropsychological outcome of head injury. J Neurosurg 50:412–422

    Google Scholar 

  23. Levin HS, Benton AL, Grossman RG (1982) Neurobehavioural consequences of closed head injury. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lezak MD (1979) Recovery of memory and learning functions following traumatic brain injury. Cortex 15:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mazzucchi A, Cattelani R, Michelotti MG, Magnani G, Passoni M, Paini PP, Parma M (1984) 1 postumi neuropsicologici e comportamentali dei traumi cranici: osservazioni con le variabili del trauma. Riv Neurol 54:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meier MJ (1983) Recovery of neuropsychological functioning outcomes as a function of age in closed head injury. Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association. Minneapolis, May 1983

  27. Miller J, Butterworth J, Lutz H, Young H, Becker D (1981) Further experience in the management of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 54:289–299

    Google Scholar 

  28. Narayan R, Greenberg R, Miller J, Enas G, Choi S, Kishore P, Selhors J, Lutz H III, Becker D (1981) Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 54:751–762

    Google Scholar 

  29. Osterrieth PA (1944) Le test de copie d'une figure complexe. Arch Psychol 30:206–356

    Google Scholar 

  30. Raven JC (1938) Standard Progressive Matrices: sts A, B, C, D, and E. Lewis, London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth JT, Boll TJ, Jane JA (1981) Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurgery 9:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rimel GW, Giordani B, Barth JT, Jane JA (1982) Moderate head injury: completing the clinical spectrum of brain trauma. Neurosurgery 11:344–351

    Google Scholar 

  33. Russel WR (1932) Cerebral involvement in head injury. A study based on the examination of 200 cases. Brain 55:549–603

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci [Suppl 8]

  35. Street RF (1931) A gestalt completion test. (Contributions to education no. 481) Bureau of Publication, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tabaddor K, Mattis S, Zuzula T (1984) Cognitive sequelae and recovery course after moderate and severe head injury. Neurosurgery 14:701–708

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tate RL, Broe GA, Lulham JM (1989) Impairment after severe blunt head injury: the results from a consecutive series of 100 patients. Acta Neurol Scand 79:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  38. Teasdale G, Skene A, Parker L, Jennet B (1979) Age and outcome of severe had injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 28 [Suppl] 140–143

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vilkki J, Poropudas K, Servo A (1988) Memory disorders related to coma duration after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:1452–1454

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wechsler D (1958) The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wilson JA, Pentland B, Currie CT, Miller D (1987) The functional effects of head injury in the elderly. Brain Inj 1:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wilson RS, Rosenbaum G, Brown G, Rourke D, Whitmen D, Grisell J (1978) An index of premorbid intelligence. J Consult Clin Psychol 46:1554–1555

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson RS, Rosenbaum G, Brown G (1979) The problem of premorbid intelligence in neuropsychological assessment. J Clin Neuropsychol 1:49–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazzucchi, A., Cattelaui, R., Missale, G. et al. Head-injured subjects aged over 50 years: correlations between variables of trauma and neuropsychologial follow-up. J Neurol 239, 256–260 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00810347

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00810347

Key words

Navigation