Abstract
The only test theory used by workers in the field of testing special relativity to analyze the significance of their experiments is the proof by H. P. Robertson [Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 378 (1949)] of the Lorentz transformations from the results of the experimental evidence. Some researchers would argue that the proof contains an unwarranted assumption disguised as a convention about synchronization procedures. Others would say that alternative conventions are possible. In the present paper, no convention is used, but the Lorentz transformations are still obtained using only the results of the experiments in Robertson's proof, namely the Michelson-Morley, Kennedy-Thorndike, and Ives-Stilwell experiments. Thus the revised proof is a valid test theory which is independent of any conventions, since one appeals only to the experimental evidence. The analysis of that evidence shows the directions in which efforts to test special relativity should go. Finally it is shown how the resulting test theory still has to be improved for consistency in the analysis of experiments with complicated experimental setups, how it can be simplified for expediency as to what should be tested, and how it should be completed for a missing step not considered by Robertson.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. P. Robertson,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 378 (1949).
A. A. Michelson and E. W. Morley,Am. J. Sci. 34, 333 (1887).
R. J. Kennedy and E. M. Thorndike,Phys. Rev. 42, 400 (1932).
H. E. Ives and G. R. Stilwell,J. Opt. Soc. Am. 28, 215 (1938).
T. S. Jaseja, A. Javan, J. Murray, and C. H. Townes,Phys. Rev. A 133, 1221 (1964).
A. Brillet and J. L. Hall,Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 549 (1979).
C. Cattaneo,Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei, Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. Rend. 24, 526 (1958); Y. P. Terletskii,The Paradoxes of Special Relativity (Plenum Press, New York, 1968); A. R. Lee and T. M. Kalotas,Am. J. Phys. 43, 434 (1975); M. Levy-Leblond,Am. J. Phys. 44, 271 (1976).
J. P. Cedarholm, G. F. Bland, W. W. Havens, Jr., and C. H. Townes,Phys. Rev. Lett. 1, 342 (1958).
J. P. Cedarholm and C. H. Townes,Nature (London) 184, 1351 (1959).
H. E. Ives and G. R. Stilwell,J. Opt. Soc. Am. 31, 369 (1941).
G. Otting,Phys. Z. 40, 681 (1939).
H. E. Mandelberg and L. Witten,J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 529 (1962).
C. Møller,The Theory of Relativity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1969).
J. G. Vargas,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 28, 289 (1980).
D. J. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1975).
P. S. Henry,Nature (London) 231, 516 (1971); B. E. Corey and D. T. Wilkinson,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 8, 351 (1976); G. F. Smoot, M. V. Gorenstein, and R. A. Muller,Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 898 (1977).
17. E. Cartan,Bull. Math. Soc. Roum. Sci. 35, 69 (1933), reprinted inOeuvres Completes (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1955), Vol. III/2, p. 1239.
C. Møller,Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 170, 306 (1982).
H. Mandelberg, Technical Report 60-20, RIAS, 7212 Bellona Ave., Baltimore 12, Maryland.
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1960).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Classical Theory of Fields (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1951).
J. G. Vargas,Found. Phys. 11, 235 (1981).
J. G. Vargas,Found. Phys. 12, 765 (1982).
J. G. Vargas,Found. Phys. 12, 889 (1982).
D. Newman, G. W. Ford, A. Rich, and E. Sweetman,Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1355 (1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vargas, J.G. Revised Robertson's test theory of special relativity. Found Phys 14, 625–651 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00738745
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00738745