Skip to main content
Log in

The quantum potential and signalling in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment

  • Part I. Invited Papers Dedicated To David Bohm
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the causal interpretation of quantum mechanics, one can precisely define the state of an individual particle in a many-body system by its position, momentum, and spin. It is shown in the EPR spin experiment that the quantum torque brings about an instantaneous change in the state of one of the particles when the other undergoes a local interaction, but that such a transfer of “information” cannot be extracted by any experiment subject to the laws of quantum mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 166, 180 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bohm, R. Schiller, and J. Tiomno,Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 1, 48 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Takabayasi,Prog. Theor. Phys. 14, 283 (1955);70, 1 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Dewdney, P. R. Holland, and A. Kyprianidis,Phys. Lett. A 119, 259 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Dewdney, P. R. Holland, and A. Kyprianidis,Phys. Lett. A 121, 105 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. R. Holland, “Causal interpretation of a system of two spin-1/2 particles,” IHP preprint, 1987.

  7. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1952), Chap. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Dewdney, P. R. Holland, and A. Kyprianidis,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20, 4717 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Dewdney and P. R. Holland, inQuantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism—The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox, F. Selleri, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Dewdney, P. R. Holland, A. Kyprianidis, and J. P. Vigier,Nature (London), in press, 1987.

  12. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 27, 293 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. J. Bussey,Phys. Lett. A 90, 9 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. N. Page,Phys. Lett. A 91, 57 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. F. Jordan,Phys. Lett. A 94, 264 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Shimony, inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology, S. Kamefuchiet al., eds. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1984), p. 225.

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. London and E. Bauer, inQuantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1983), p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. D. Cantrell and M. O. Scully,Phys. Rep. 43, 499 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. de Broglie,Non-Linear Wave Mechanics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Kyprianidis,Phys. Lett. A 111, 111 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. R. Holland,Found. Phys. 17, 345 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. P. Vigier,Astron. Nachr. 303, 55 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to David Bohm on the occasion of his 70th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holland, P.R., Vigier, J.P. The quantum potential and signalling in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. Found Phys 18, 741–750 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00734154

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00734154

Keywords

Navigation