Abstract
Two types of contextual theories are distinguished and shown to be related. For theories of each type a criterion of locality is formulated which is weaker than the classical requirement of separability at spacelike intervals. The relations between the concepts of locality, realism, and ontic chance are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F. Rohrlich,Science 221, 4617, 1251 (1983).
E. P. Wigner, inQuantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1983), pp. 310–312; N. N. Bogolubov, A. A. Logunov, and I. T. Todorov,Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory (Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975), Chap. 15.
N. N. Bogolubov, A. A. Logunov, and I. T. Todorov,Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory (Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975), Chap. 9 ff.
A. Shimony,Br. J. Philos. Sci. 35, 25–45 (1984); J. S. Bell,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966).
D. Dieks,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 38, 13, 443–447 (1983).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).
B. C. van Fraassen,The Scientific Image (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980), p. 8.
A. Fine, inScience and Reality, J. T. Cushing, C. F. Delaney, and G. M. Gutting, eds. (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, 1984), pp. 106–133 and, in particular, p. 118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoekzema, D. Locality and realism in contextual theories. Found Phys 17, 787–797 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733267
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733267