Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 959–975 | Cite as

The asymmetry of radiation: Reinterpreting the Wheeler-Feynman argument

  • Huw Price
Article

Abstract

This paper suggests a novel reinterpretation of the mathematical core of Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory, and hence a new route to the conclusion that the temporal asymmetry of classical electromagnetic radiation has the same origin as that of thermodynamics. The argument begins (Sec. 2) with a careful analysis of what the apparent asymmetry of radiation actually involves. Two major flaws in the standard version of the Wheeler-Feynman treatment of radiative asymmetry are then identified (Secs. 4–5), and the proposed reinterpretation is described (Sec. 6). This avoids the two flaws previously mentioned, and also the problematic dependence of radiation on cosmological structure.

Keywords

Radiation Electromagnetic Radiation Careful Analysis Major Flaw Standard Version 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Burman,Observatory 90, 240–249 (1970).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Burman,Observatory 91 141–154 (1971).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Burman,Observatory 92, 128–131, 131–135 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Burman,Phys. Lett. A 53, 17–18 (1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. G. Cramer, “Generalized absorber theory and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,”Phys. Rev. D 22, 362 (1980).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. G. Cramer, “The arrow of electromagnetic time and the generalized absorber theory,”Found. Phys. 13, 887 (1983).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. G. Cramer, “The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 647 (1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. G. Cramer, “An overview of the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics,”Int. J. Theoret. Phys. 27, 227 (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. L. Csonka, “Advanced effects in particle physics,”Phys. Rev. 180, 1266 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. C. W. Davies,The Physics of Time Asymmetry (Surrey University Press, Leighton Buzzard, 1974).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. C. W. Davies,Space and Time in the Modern Universe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. C. W. Davies,Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 68, 751 (1970).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. C. W. Davies,J. Phys. A 4, 836 (1971).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. C. W. Davies,J. Phys. A 5, 1025 (1972).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. C. W. Davies,J. Phys. A 5, 1722 (1972).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Einstein and W. Ritz, “Zum gegenwärtigen Stand des Strahlungsproblem,”Phys. Z. 10, 323 (1909).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Gold, ed.,The Nature of Time (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Hawking,A Brief History of Time (Bantam, London, 1988).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. E. Hogarth,Proc. R. Soc. London A 267, 365 (1962).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Hoyle and J. V. Narlikar,Proc. R. Soc. London A 277, 1 (1964).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. Hoyle and J. V. Narlikar,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 54, 207 (1969).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    F. Hoyle and J. V. Narlikar,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 62, 44 (1971).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    F. Hoyle and J. V. Narlikar,Action at a distance in Physics and Cosmology (Freeman, San Francisco, 1974).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. V. Narlikar,Proc. R. Soc. London A 270, 553 (1962).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. B. Partridge,Nature (London) 244, 263 (1973).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Penrose,The Emperor's New Mind (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Popper, “The arrow of time,”Nature (London) 177, 538 (1956).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    H. Price, “The philosophy and physics of affecting the past,”Synthese 16, 299–323 (1984).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Price, “Saving free will,”New Scientist, p. 55, 12 January 1991.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. W. Sciama, “Determinism and the cosmos,” in S. Hook (ed.),Determinism and Freedom in the Age of Modern Science (New York University Press, New York, 1958), pp. 76–78.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    L. M. Stephenson, “Clarification of an apparent asymmetry in electromagnetic theory,”Found. Phys. 8, 921 (1978).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman, “Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of radiation,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157–181 (1945).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    H. D. Zeh,The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huw Price
    • 1
  1. 1.Traditional and Modern PhilosophyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations