Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 889–904 | Cite as

The problem of objectification in quantum mechanics

  • Paul Busch
  • Peter Mittelstaedt
Article

Abstract

The hypotheses of weak and strong objectification of quantum mechanical observables, as well as theoretical arguments and experimental evidence against these hypotheses, are systematically reviewed.

Keywords

Quantum Mechanic Experimental Evidence Theoretical Argument Strong Objectification Mechanical Observable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Aspect, Ph. Grangier, and G. Roger, “Experimental realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-RosenGedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell's inequalities,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91–94 (1982).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradoxon,”Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Busch, “Elements of unsharp reality in the EPR experiment,” inSymposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1985, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985), pp. 343–357.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Busch, “Macroscopic quantum systems and the objectification problem,” inSymposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), pp. 62–76.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Busch, P. Lahti, and P. Mittelstaedt,The Quantum Theory of Measurement (Springer, Berlin, 1991) (in press).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Busch and F. E. Schroeck, Jr., “On the reality of spin and helicity,”Found. Phys. 19, 807–872 (1989).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Fine, “Hidden variables, joint probability, and the Bell inequality,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291–295 (1982).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Mittelstaedt, “On the applicability of the probability concept to quantum theory,” inFoundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Interference, and Statistical Theories of Science, W. I. Harper and C. A. Hooker, eds. Vol. III (Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1976), pp. 155–167.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Mittelstaedt,Quantum Logic (Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1978).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Mittelstaedt,Philosophische Probleme der Modernen Physik, 7th edn. (BI-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, 1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Mittelstaedt, “The objectification in the measuring process and the many-worlds interpretation,” inSymposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), pp. 261–279.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Möllenstedt and H. Lichte, “Young-Fresnelscher Interferenzversuch...,”Optik 51, 423–428 (1978).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Rauch, “Quantum measurements in neutron interferometry,” inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, M. Namikiet al., eds. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1987), pp. 3–17 and the literature quoted there.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. W. Stachow, “Sequential quantum logic,” inCurrent Issues in Quantum Logic, E. Beltrametti and B. C. van Fraassen, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1981), pp. 173–151.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. W. Stachow, “Der quantenlogische Wahrscheinlichkeitskalkül,” inGrundlagenprobleme der modernen Physik, J. Nitsch, J. Pfarr, and E. W. Stachow, eds. (B.I.-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, 1981), pp. 271–305.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. W. Stachow, “Quantum logical description of microsystems,” inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, S. Kamefuchiet al., eds. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1984), pp. 244–250.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bas C. van Fraassen, “A modal interpretation of quantum mechanics,” inCurrent Issues in Quantum Logic, E. C. Beltrametti and Bas C. van Fraassen, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bas C. van Fraassen, “The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics,” inSymposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), pp. 440–460.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Busch
    • 1
  • Peter Mittelstaedt
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations