Skip to main content
Log in

Tachyon kinematics and causality: A systematic thorough analysis of the tachyon causal paradoxes

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chronological order of the events along a spacelike path is not invariant under Lorentz transformations, as is well known. This led to an early conviction that tachyons would give rise to causal anomalies. A relativistic version of the Stückelberg-Feynman “switching procedure” (SWP) has been invoked as the suitable tool to eliminate those anomalies. The application of the SWP does eliminate the motions backwards in time, but interchanges the roles ofsource anddetector. This fact triggered the proposal of a host of causal “paradoxes.” Till now, however, it has not been recognized that such paradoxes can be sensibly discussed (and completely solved, at least “in microphysics”)only after the tachyon relativistic mechanics has been properly developed. We start by showing how to apply the SWP, both in the case ofordinary special relativity and in the case with tachyons. Then we carefully exploit the kinematics of the tachyon exchange between to (ordinary) bodies. Being finally able to tackle the tachyon causality problem, we successively solve the paradoxes of : (i) Tolman-Regge, (ii) Pirani, (iii) Edmonds, and (iv) Bell. Finally, we discuss a further, new paradox associated with the transmission of signals by modulated tachyon beams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. C. Tolman,The Theory of Relativity of Motion (Berkeley, 1917), p. 54.

  2. O. M. Bilaniuk, V. K. Deshpande, and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Am. J. Phys. 30, 718 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Recami,Found. Phys. 8, 329–340 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Caldirola and E. Recami, inItalian Studies in the Philosophy of Science, M. L. Dalla Chiara, ed. (Reidel, Boston, 1980), pp. 249–298.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Garuccio, G. D. Maccarrone, E. Recami, and J. P. Vigier,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 27, 60–64 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Mignani and E. Recami,Phys. Lett. B 65, 148–150 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Gödel, inA. Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Open Court, La Salle, 1973), p. 558.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Recami, inAlbert Einstein, 1879–1979: Relativity, Quanta and Cosmology, F. de Finis and M. Pantaleo, eds. (Johnson Reprints, New York, 1979), Vol. 2, Chap. 16, pp. 537–597. This ref. appeared also in Italian:Centenario di Einstein: Astrofisica e Cosmologia, Gravitazione, Quanti e Relativitá, M. Pantaleo, ed. (Giunti-Barbera, Florence, 1979), Chap. 18, pp. 1021–1097; and in Russian:Astrofizika, Kvanti i Teoriya Otnositelnosti, F. I. Fedorov, ed. (Mir, Moscow, 1982), pp. 53–128.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Recami and R. Mignani,Riv. Nuovo Cimento 4, 209–290, 398 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Recami, inTachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Recami and G. Ziino,Nuovo Cimento A 33, 205–215 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. C. G. Stückelberg,Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 321, 588 (1941); see also O. Klein,Z. Phys. 53, 157 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. P. Feynman,Phys. Rev. 76, 749, 769 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Mignani and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 18, 5–9 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Mignani and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 24, 438–448 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Mignani and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 11, 421–426 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Mignani and E. Recami,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 12, 299–320 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Pavšič and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento (1982)34, 357–362. Erratum:35, 354 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Feinberg,Phys. Rev. 159, 1089 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Arzeliès,C. R. Acad. Sc. (Paris) A 279, 535 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. G. Cawley,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 54, 132 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. C. L. Barnard and E. A. Sallin,Phys. Today 22 (10), 9 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Recami,Accad. Naz. Lincei Rendic. Sc. (Roma) 49, 77–91 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Baldo, G. Fonte, and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 4, 241–247 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Recami, “Classical Tachyons,” Report INFN/AE-84/8 (INFN, Frascati, 1984), pp. 1–178.

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. Recami and E. Modica,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 12, 263–265 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Galilei:Dialogo... sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo: Tolemaico e Copernicano (G. B. Landini, Florence, 1632).

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. Galilei:Dialogue on the Great World Systems: Salisbury Translation, G. de Santillana, ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1953), p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami,Found. Phys. 14, 367–407 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami, Report INFN/AE-82/12 (INFN, Frascati, 1982), pp. 1–39.

  31. W. V. Igńatowski,Phys. Lett. 21, 972 (1910).

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. Frank and H. Rothe,Ann. Phys. (Leipz.) 34, 825 (1911).

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Hahn,Arch. Math. Phys. 21, 1 (1913).

    Google Scholar 

  34. V. Lalan,Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 65, 83 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. Severi, inCinquant'anni di Relatività, M. Pantaleo, ed. Giunti-Editrice Universitaria (Florence, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Agodi,Lezioni di Fisica Teorica (Catania University, unpublished).

  37. M. Di Jorio,Nuovo Cimento B 22, 70 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  38. W. Rindler,Essential Relativity (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1969), Sec. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  39. N. Berzi and V. Gorini,J. Math. Phys. 10, 1518 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  40. V. Gorini and A. Zecca,J. Math. Phys. 11, 2226 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. Lugiato and V. Gorini,J. Math. Phys. 13, 665 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  42. T. S. Shankara,Found. Phys. 4, 97 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  43. G. D. Maccarrone, M. Pavšič, and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento B 73, 91–111 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. O. Barut, G. D. Maccarrone, and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 71, 509–533 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  45. E. Recami and R. Mignani,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 4, 144–152 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  46. D. Leiter,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 1, 395 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  47. L. Parker,Phys. Rev. 138, 2287 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  48. O. M. Bilaniuk and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Today 22 (5), 43 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  49. P. Castorina and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 22, 195 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  50. G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 57, 85–101 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  51. E. Recami, inEnciclopedia EST Mondadori, Annuario 73 (Mondadori, Milano, 1973), pp. 85–94, in Italian.

    Google Scholar 

  52. E. Recami,Scientia 109, 721–727 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  53. P. Caldirola and E. Recami,Epistemologia (Genova) 1, 263–304 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  54. C. Gregory,Nature (London) 206, 702 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  55. C. Gregory,Nature Phys. Sci. 239, 56–57 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  56. C. Schwartz,Phys. Rev. D 25, 356 (1982). See also D. Korff and Z. Fried,Nuovo Cimento A 52, 173 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  57. E. Recami and R. Mignani,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 8, 780–782 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  58. G. D. Maccarrone and E. Recami,Found. Phys. 10, 949–957 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  59. M. E. Arons and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Rev. 173, 1622 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  60. J. Dhar and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Rev. 174, 1808 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  61. M. Glück,Nuovo Cimento A 62, 791 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  62. M. Camenzind,Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 1, 41 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  63. D. J. Thoules,Nature (London) 224, 506 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  64. W. B. Rolnick,Phys. Rev. 183, 1105 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  65. W. B. Rolnick,Phys. Rev. D6, 2300 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  66. G. A. Benford, D. L. Book, and W. A. Newcomb,Phys. Rev. D 2, 263 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  67. J. Strnad,Fortsch. Phys. 18, 237 (1970); J. Strnad and A. Kodre,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 12, 261 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  68. J. S. Trefil, inTachyons, Monopoles and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 27–30; R. G. Root and J. S. Trefil:Lett. Nuovo Cimento 3, 412 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  69. P. L. Csonka,Nucl. Phys. B 21, 436 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  70. E. C. G. Sudarshan, inSymposia on Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, Vol.10 (New York; 1970), p. 129.

  71. O. M. Bilaniuk and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Nature (London) 223, 386 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  72. A. F. Antippa,Nuovo Cimento A 10, 389–406 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  73. A. F. Antippa and A. E. Everett,Phys. Rev. D 8, 2352 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  74. E. Recami and W. A. Rodrigues,Found. Phys. 12, 709–718 (1982); plus Erratum,13, 533 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  75. M. Baldo and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento (1st Ser.) 2, 643–646 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  76. E. Recami, unpublished work and unpublished pieces of work in collaboration with H. B. Nielsenet al., 1974.

  77. E. Recami, inTopics in Theoretical and Experimental Gravitation Physics, V. De Sabbata and J. Weber, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1977), pp. 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ø. Grøn,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 23, 97 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  79. R. Mignani and E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 7, 388–390 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  80. H. Bondi,Relativity and Common Sense (Doubleday, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  81. E. Recami, G. D. Maccarrone, H. B. Nielsen, H. C. Corben, M. Rodonò, and S. Genovesi, unpublished work, 1976.

  82. R. Mignani and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 14, 169–189 (1973); Erratum,16, 208 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  83. H. Bacry,Phys. Today 25 (11), 15 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  84. H. Bacry, Ph. Combe, and P. Sorba,Rep. Math. Phys. 5, 145 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  85. A. O. Barut,Phys. Lett. A 67, 257 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  86. K. L. Sala,Phys. Rev. A 19, 2377 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  87. A. O. Barut, inTachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  88. A. Peres,Phys. Lett. A 31, 361 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  89. J. Souček,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 14, 1629–1640 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  90. E. Recami and G. D. Maccarrone,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 37, 345 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  91. D. Bohm,The Special Theory of Relativity (Benjamin, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  92. T. Regge,Cronache dell'Universo (Boringhieri, Torino, 1981), pp. 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  93. F. A. E. Pirani,Phys. Rev. D 1, 3224 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  94. J. A. Parmentola and D. D. H. Yee,Phys. Rev. D 4, 1912 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  95. E. C. G. Sudarshan, Report CPT-81/AEC-30 (Texas University, Austin, 1970); E. C. G. Sudarshan, inProceedings of the VIII Nobel Symposium, N. Swartholm, ed. (New York, 1970), p. 385.

  96. J. D. Edmonds,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 18, 498 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  97. E. Recami,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 18, 501–502 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  98. J. S. Bell, private communications (1979, 1985).

  99. R. Fox, C. G. Kuper, and S. G. Lipson,Nature (London) 223, 597 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  100. R. Fox, C. G. Kuper, and S. G. Lipson,Proc. R. Soc. London A 316, 515 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  101. M. Pavšič and E. Recami,Nuovo Cimento A 36, 171 (1976); Erratum,46, 298 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  102. J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  103. J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 425 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  104. J. R. Gott, III,Nuovo Cimento B 22, 49 (1974). See also M. Flato and M. Guenin,Helv. Phys. Acta 50, 117 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  105. H. P. Stapp,Am. J. Phys. 53, 306 (1985); G. C. Hegerfeld,Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2395 (1985); E. P. Wigner, private communication (1976); J. P. Vigier,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 29, 476 (1980); B. d'Espagnat,Found. Phys. 11, 205 (1981); C. W. Rietdijk and F. Selleri,Found. Phys. 15, 303 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  106. R. G. Newton,Phys. Rev. 162, 1274 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  107. J. D. Edmonds,Found. Phys. 6, 33 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  108. A. Einstein and P. Bergmann,Ann. Math. 39, 683 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  109. J. D. Edmonds,Found. Phys. 4, 473 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  110. K. Lake and R. C. Roeder,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 12, 641–644 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  111. M. Pavšič and E. Recami:Lett. Nuovo Cimento 19, 273–278 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  112. O. Costa de Beauregard, inThe Wave-Particle Dualism, S. Dineret al., eds. (Reidel, Dortrecht, 1984), p. 485.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work partially supported by MPI and by FAP-UNICAMP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Recami, E. Tachyon kinematics and causality: A systematic thorough analysis of the tachyon causal paradoxes. Found Phys 17, 239–296 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733092

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733092

Keywords

Navigation