Response to Rodrigues and Rosa on the twin paradox
- 56 Downloads
This paper responds briefly to the criticism of Rodrigues and Rosa on my earlier analysis of the twin paradox. The main point that I have emphasized (and that the authors have not refuted, either logically or mathematically) is the error in directly identifying anabstract measure relative to a reference frame [and its transformations to all other possible reference frames in which the laws of nature are to be compared (such as temporal and spatial measures)], with aphysical extension and duration of a material body.
KeywordsReference Frame Early Analysis Material Body Spatial Measure Twin Paradox
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.W. A. Rodrigues and M. A. F. Rosa,Found. Phys. 19, 705 (1989).Google Scholar
- 2.M. Sachs,Phys. Today 24, 23 (1971);Einstein Versus Bohr (Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1988), Chap. 9.Google Scholar
- 3.M. Sachs,Found. Phys. 15, 977 (1985).Google Scholar
- 4.A. Einstein, “Autobiographical Notes,” inAlbert Einstein—Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1970), p. 59.Google Scholar
- 5.A. Einstein,Sidelights of Relativity (E. P. Dutton, New York, 1922; Dover, New York, 1985), p. 35.Google Scholar
- 6.A. Einstein, Ref. (4). “Google Scholar
- 7.M. Sachs,General Relativity and Matter (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1982), Chaps. 3 and 6.Google Scholar
- 8.J. Terrelet al., Phys. Today 25, 9 (1972).Google Scholar