Abstract
A simple proof of a weak version of Eliezer's theorem on unphysical solutions of the Lorentz-Dirac equation is given. This version concerns a free particle scattered by a spatially localized electric field in one space dimension. (The solutions are also solutions in three space dimensions.) It establishes that for certain physically reasonable localized fields, all solutions which are free (i.e., unaccelerated) before they enter the field have unbounded proper acceleration and velocity asymptotic to that of light in the future. For any given initial velocity, the fields yielding this unphysical behavior can be arbitrarily weak. The result is then extended to a class of static fields which need not be spatially localized, including Coulomb fields. For this case the same conclusion is obtained omitting the assumption that the particle be free in the past.
The rest of the paper discusses solutions to the localized field problem which are assumed free in the future rather than the past. Some strange features of these solutions are noted. The possibility of experimentally detecting deviations from the Coulomb law for a particle obeying the Lorentz-Dirac equation is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. A. M. Dirac, “Classical theories of radiating electrons,”Proc. R. Soc. London A 167, 148 (1938).
F. Rohrlich,Classical Charged Particles (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1990).
S. Parrott,Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry (Springer, New York, 1987).
E. Comay, “Physical solutions and mathematical properties of the Lorentz-Dirac equation,”Found. Phys. Lett. 3, 221–238 (1990).
E. Comay, “Stability problems of numerical solutions to the Lorentz-Dirac Equation,”Appl. Math. Lett. 4, 11–14 (1991).
E. Comay, Errata to “Stability problems of numerical solutions to the Lorentz-Dirac Equation,”Appl. Math. Lett. 5, 67 (1992).
W. E. Baylis and J. Huschilt, “Numerical solutions to two-body problems in classical electrodynamics: Head-on collisions with retarded fields and radiation reaction. II. Attractive case,”Phys. Rev. D 13, 3262–3268 (1976).
D. K. Hsing and R. D. Driver, “Radiation reaction in classical electrodynamics,” inDynamical Systems (Proceedings of a University of Florida International Symposium) (Academic Press, New York, 1977).
D. K. Hsing and R. D. Driver, “Radiation reaction in the two-body problem of classical electrodynamics,” Technical Report No. 61, University of Rhode Island, October 1975.
C. J. Eliezer, “The hydrogen atom and the classical theory of radiation,”Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 39, 173–180 (1943).
G. N. Plass, “Motion with radiative reaction,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 33, 37–62 (1961).
J. K. Hale and A. P. Stokes,J. Math. Phys. 3, 70 (1963).
J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, second edition (Wiley, New York, 1975).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parrott, S. Unphysical and physical(?) solutions of the Lorentz-Dirac equation. Found Phys 23, 1093–1119 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00732415
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00732415