Skip to main content
Log in

Tachyon kinematics in parametrized relativistic quantum mechanics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A kinematic description of mass state transitions is derived within the context of parametrized relativistic quantum mechanics (PRQM). It is shown that a collision between two bradyons can result in the formation of a tachyon. Conversely, the formation of a bradyon following the interaction of a tachyon with a bradyon is also possible. The PRQM kinematics is used to describe the role of tachyons in particle beam-thin foil scattering experiments and counter-circulating beam experiments. Conditions under which tachyons may be experimentally created and detected at meson factories such as LAMPF and TRIUMF are determined. Several numerical examples are given, and many technical details are included in the appendices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. M. Greenberger,J. Math. Phys. 15, 395 (1974) and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. T. Todorov,Proceedings of the Barcelona Workshop on “Relativistic Action at a Distance: Classical and Quantum Aspects,” J. Llosa, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. P. Horwitz,Old and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology: Essays in Honor of Wolfgang Yourgrau, A. van der Merwe, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. R. Fanchi and W. J. Wilson,Found. Phys. 13, 571 (1983) and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Kubo,Nuovo Cimento 85, 293 (1985); A. Kyrianidis,Phys. Rep. 155, 1 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. R. Fanchi,Phys. Rev. D 20, 3108 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. R. Fanchi,Phys. Rev. A 37, 3956 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell,Relativistic Quantum Fields (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966); N. N. Bogoliubov and D. V. Shirkov,Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields, 3rd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. R. Fanchi,Phys. Rev. A 34, 1677 (1986);35, 4859 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. C. Aron,Found. Phys. 16, 1021 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. M. P. Bilaniuk, V. K. Deshpande, and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Am. J. Phys. 30, 718 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Feinberg,Phys. Rev. 159, 1089 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. M. P. Bilaniuk and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Today 22, 43 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Recami,Found. Phys. 17, 239 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. M. Feldman,Am. J. Phys. 42, 179 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Bandukwala and D. Shay,Phys. Rev. D 9, 889 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Shay,J. Math. Phys. 16, 1934 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. L. Agudin and A. M. Patzeck,J. Math. Phys. 25, 1122 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. E. Everett,Phys. Rev. D 13, 785 and 795 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Soucek,J. Phys. A 14, 1629 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Davidson and D. A. Owen,Phys. Lett. B 177, 77 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Davidson,Phys. Rev. D 35, 1811 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Recami, A. Castellino, G. D. Maccarrone, and M. Rodono,Nuovo Cimento B 93, 119 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. C. Foster, Jr., and J. R. Ray,J. Math. Phys. 13, 979 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. K. Raychaudhuri,J. Math. Phys. 15, 856 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. V. Narlikar and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 175, 105 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. K. Srivastava and M. P. Pathak,J. Math. Phys. 19, 2000 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. V. Dhurandhar,J. Math. Phys. 19, 561 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Talukdar, M. Sen, and D. Sen,J. Math. Phys. 22, 377 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. K. Srivastava,J. Math. Phys. 25, 693 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. E. Arons and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Rev. 173, 1622 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Dhar and E. C. G. Sudarshan,Phys. Rev. 174, 1808 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Robinett,Phys. Rev. D 18, 3610 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  34. H. B. Nielsen, inTachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. C. G. Sudarshan, inTachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. I. Sutherland and J. R. Shepanski,Phys. Rev. D 33, 2896 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  37. T. Alvager and M. N. Kreisler,Phys. Rev. 171, 1357 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. Baltav, G. Feinberg, N. Yeh, and R. Linsker,Phys. Rev. D 1, 759 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. S. Danburg and G. R. Kalbfleisch,Phys. Rev. D 5, 1575 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  40. P. V. R. Murthy,Phys. Rev. D 7, 2252 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. Ljubicic, Z. Pavlovic, K. Pisk, and B. A. Logan,Phys. Rev. D 11, 696 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. N. Kreisler,Phys. Teacher, p. 429 (October 1975).

  43. H. Hanni and E. Hugentobler, inTachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Ljubicic, K. Pisk, and B. A. Logan,Phys. Rev. D 20, 1016 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. Mariniet al., Phys. Rev. D 26, 1777 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  46. H. C. Corben, inTachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  47. H. Lemke,Phys. Rev. D 22, 1342 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  48. S. K. Srivastava,J. Math. Phys. 24, 1317 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  49. L. P. Horwitz,Found. Phys. 14, 1027 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  50. L. P. Horwitz and Y. Lavie,Phys. Rev. D 26, 819 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. R. Fanchi and R. E. Collins,Found. Phys. 8, 851 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  52. R. Arshansky, L. P. Horwitz, and Y. Lavie,Found. Phys. 12, 1167 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  53. P. A. M. Dirac,The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn. (Oxford University Press, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  54. D. I. Blokhintsev,Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  55. S. Gasiorowicz,Quantum Physics (Wiley, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  56. L. I. Schiff,Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  57. A. Landé,Quantum Mechanics (Pitman, London, 1951); and E. Fermi,Rev. Mod. Phys. 4, 87 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  58. J. J. J. Kokkedee,The Quark Model (Benjamin, New York, 1969), Chap. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  59. A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow,Phys. Rev. D 12, 147 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  60. C. Garrod,Twentieth Century Physics (Faculty Publishers, Davis, California, 1984);Physics Vade Mecum, by H. L. Anderson, ed. (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1981), p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Particle Data Group, “Review of Particle Properties,”Phys. Lett. B 170, 1–350 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  62. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,The Classical Theory of Fields (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Y. Nambu,Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 82 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fanchi, J.R. Tachyon kinematics in parametrized relativistic quantum mechanics. Found Phys 20, 189–224 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731646

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731646

Keywords

Navigation