Skip to main content
Log in

An intriguing legacy of Einstein, Fermi, Jordan, and others: The possible invalidation of quark conjectures

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to present an outline of a number of criticisms of the quark models of hadron structure which have been present in the community of basic research for some time. The hope is that quark supporters will consider these criticisms and present possible counterarguments for a scientifically effective resolution of the issues. In particular, it is submitted that the problem of whether quarks exist as physical particles necessarily calls for the prior theoretical and experimental resolution of the question of the validity or invalidity, for hadronic structure, of the relativity and quantum mechanical laws established for atomic structure. The current theoretical studies leading to the conclusion that they are invalid are considered, together with the experimental situation. We also recall the doubts by Einstein, Fermi, Jordan, and others on the final character of contemporary physical knowledge. Most of all, this paper is an appeal to young minds of all ages. The possible invalidity for the strong interactions of the physical laws of the electromagnetic interactions, rather than constituting a scientific drawback, represents instead an invaluable impetus toward the search for covering laws specifically conceived for hadronic structure and strong interactions in general, a program which has already been initiated by a number of researchers. In turn, this situation appears to have all the ingredients for a new scientific renaissance, perhaps comparable to that of the early part of this century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Gell-Mann,Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Zweigh, CERN reports 8182/Th and 8419/Th (412), (1964).

  3. J. J. J. Kokkedee,The Quark Model (Benjamin, New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. E. Close,Introduction to Quarks and Partons (Academic Press, London, in press).

  5. H. D. Politzer,Phys. Reports 14, 129 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. B. Lehtenberg and S. P. Rosen, eds.,Developments in the Quark Theory of Hadrons, Vol. I (1980), Vol. II (to appear) (Hadronic Press, Nonantum, Mass.)

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. M. Santilli,Ann. Phys. 103, 354 (1977); 409 (1977);105, 227 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Morpurgo and W. M. Fairbanks,Physics Today 1977 (Dec.), 9–11.

  9. G. S. Larue, W. M. Fairbank, and J. D. Phillips,Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 142 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Chun-Xuan,Hadronic J. 3, 256 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Nanbu, Quark confinement: the cases for and against, invited talk to the Jerusalem Einstein Centennial Symposium (1979), to appear in theProceedings.

  12. R. M. Santilli,Hadronic J. 1, 574 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. O. W. Greenberg and C. A. Nelson,Phys. Reports 32C, 69 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. M. Santilli,Hadronic J. 2, 1460 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Lie-admissible Formulations, Part A: Review Papers,Hadronic J. 2, 1252–2018 (1979); and Part B: Research Papers,Hadronic J. 3, 1–725 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. C. Myung, S. Okubo, and R. M. Santilli, eds.,Applications of Lie-admissible in Physics, Vol. I and II (1978), III and IV (in press), and V (to appear).

  17. R. M. Santilli,Lie-admissible Approach to the Hadronic Structure, Vol. I:Nonapplicability of the Galilei and Einstein Relativities? (1978); Vol. II:Coverings of the Galilei and Einstein Relativities? (in press); and Vol. III:Identification of the Hadronic Constitutents with Physical Particles? (1980) (Hadronic Press, Nonantum, Mass.)

  18. R. M. Santilli,Foundations of Theoretical Mechanics, Vol. I:The Inverse Problem in Newtonian Mechanics (1978); Vol. II:The Birkhoffian Generalization of Hamiltonian Mechanics (in press) (Springer-Verlag, New York/Heidelberg).

  19. W. Pauli,Z. Phys. 31, 765 (1925);Science 103, 213 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. M. Santilli,Hadronic J. 1, 223 (1978);1, 1279 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. M. Santilli,Hadronic J. 3, 440 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Abraham and J. E. Marsden,Foundations of Mechanics (Benjamin, Reading, Mass.).

  23. W. Sarlet and F. Cantrijn,Hadronic J. 1, 101 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. N. Ktorides,J. Math. 16, 2130 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. N. Ktorides, H. C. Myung, and R. M. Santilli,Phys. Rev. D 22, 892 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. C. Myung and R. M. Santilli,Hadronic J. 3, 196 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. K. P. Ghikas, C. N. Ktorides, and L. Papaloukas,Hadronic J. 3, 726 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. Sarlet,Hadronic J. 2, 91 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  29. F. Cantrijn,Hadronic J. 2, 481 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Fronteau, A. Tellez-Arenas, and R. M. Santilli,Hadronic J. 3, 177 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. A. Kobussen,Hadronic J. 3, 79 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. E. Prince, P. G. Leach, T. M. Kalotas, C. J. Eliezer, and R. M. Santilli,Hadronic J. 3, 390 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Tellez-Arenas, J. Fronteau, and R. M. Santilli,Hadronic J. 3, 177 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. Y. Kim,Hadronic J. 1, 1343 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  35. H. Yilmaz,Hadronic J. 2, 1186 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. M. Santilli,Ann. Phys. 83, 108 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  37. W. Yourgrau and A. van der Merwe, eds.,Perspectives in Quantum Theory (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971; reprinted by Dover, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. Bricmanet al., Phys. Lett. 75B, 1 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  39. E. Eichten and G. Gottfried,Phys. Lett. 66B, 286 (1977); W. Celmaster, H. Georgi, and M. Machacek,Phys. Rev. D 17, 874, 879 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  40. W. N. Celmaster, Quantum bound states in a color confined theory, Ph.D. Thesis (1977), Lyman Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  41. R. M. Santilli,Phys. Rev. D 20, 555 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  42. R. M. Santilli, invited talk at the 1980 Conference on Differential Geometric Methods in Mathematical Physics, University of Clausthal, West Germany,Hadronic J. 4, 1166 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  43. C. N. Ktorides,Hadronic J. 1, 194, 1012 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  44. S. Okubo, invited talk at the Third Workshop on Current Problems in High Energy Particle Theory, Florence, Italy (1979); andPhys. Rev. D 22, 987 (1980).

  45. S. Okubo, invited talk at the Third Workshop in Lie-Admissible Formulations, Boston (1980),Hadronic J. 4, 608 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Proceedings of the Third Workshop in Lie-Admissible Formulations, Boston (1980), to appear inHadronic J.

  47. H. Rauch, A. Wilfing, W. Bauspiess, and U. Bonse,Z. Physik B 29, 281 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  48. W. Heisenberg,Physics and Beyond (1971).

  49. E. Fermi,Nuclear Physics (1949).

  50. P. Jordan, J. von Neumann, and E. P. Wigner,Ann. Math. 35, 29 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  51. E. P. Wigner,Symmetries and Reflections (1967).

  52. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Lie-Admissible Formulations, Volume C: Experimental Physics and Bibliography,Hadronic J. 4 (1981).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract numbers ER-78-S-02-4742.A000 and AS02-78ER04742.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santilli, R.M. An intriguing legacy of Einstein, Fermi, Jordan, and others: The possible invalidation of quark conjectures. Found Phys 11, 383–472 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00727075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00727075

Keywords

Navigation