Foundations of Physics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 93–100 | Cite as

Aesthetic fields—Null theory II

  • M. Muraskin


We have again studied a null theory within the complex aesthetic field theory. This time we required that the spatially inverted origin point data represent the imaginary part of the complex origin point data. This was not the case in our previous studies of the null aesthetic field theory. However, this procedure did not lead to effects not previously observed as far as we could tell. Adding an additional term to the origin point data that presented the null character of the theory also did not lead to new effects. We also investigated a real null theory that led to constant fields. This theory was then made complex by a procedure discussed in the early part of the paper. We found that the resulting complex theory remained trivial nevertheless. Again, we found that it was not necessary for the theory to be null to find “confluence” type solutions.


Field Theory Imaginary Part Additional Term Early Part Complex Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Muraskin,Found. Phys. 10, 887 (1980).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Muraskin,Int. J. Theoret. Phys. 6, 37 (1972).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Muraskin,J. Math. Phys. 21, 1155 (1980).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Muraskin,Int. Journal of Theoretical Physics 13, 313 (1975);Int. J. Theoret. Phys. 15, 521 (1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Muraskin and B. Ring,Found. Phys. 5, 513 (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Muraskin,J. Math. Phys. 22, 569 (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Muraskin
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of North DakotaGrand Forks

Personalised recommendations