Skip to main content
Log in

On the hypotheses underlying physical geometry

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between physics and geometry is examined in classical and quantum physics based on the view that the symmetry group of physics and the automorphism group of the geometry are the same. Examination of quantum phenomena reveals that the space-time manifold is not appropriate for quantum theory. A different conception of geometry for quantum theory on the group manifold, which may be an arbitrary Lie group, is proposed. This provides a unified description of gravity and gauge fields as well as generalizations of these fields. A correspondence principle which relates the geometry of quantum physics and the geometry of classical physics is formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Riemann,Abh. der Ges. der Wiss. Gött. 13, 1 (1868) [English translation in W. K. Clifford,Collected Mathematical Papers].

  2. Felix Klein, A Comparative Review of Recent Researches in Geometry (Erlanger 1872) [English translation inN.Y. Math. Soc. Bull. 2 (July), 215 (1893)].

  3. H. Weyl,Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science (Princeton Univ. Press, 1949), Chapter 111, 13;The Classical Groups (Princeton Univ. Press, 1946), Chapter 1, 4.

  4. G. Cantor,Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers (Dover, 1955).

  5. Yu-Lee Lee,Pac. J. Math. 20, 77 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. L. Synge,Relativity: The General Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1960), Chapter III.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Wigner, inSymmetries and Reflections (MIT Press, 1967); H. Salacker and E. Wigner,Phys. Rev. 109, 571 (1958).

  8. R. Penrose, inBatelle Recontres, C. M. DeWitt and J. A. Wheeler, eds. (Benjamin, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Trautman,Rep. Math. Phys. 1, 29 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Ehlers, F. A. E. Pirani, and A. Schild, inPapers in Honour of J. L. Synge, L. O'Raifeartaigh, ed. (Clarenden Press, Oxford 1972); see also H. Weyl,Nachr. Ges. Wiss.-Gottingen 99 (1921); R. F. Marzke and J. A. Wheeler, inGravitation and Relativity, H. Y. Chiu and W. F. Hoffmann, eds. (Benjamin, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Anandan,Nuovo Cim. 53A, 221 (1979); see also J. AnandanPhys. Rev. D 15, 1448 (1977); andInt. J. Theor. Phys., to appear (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Anandan, inQuantum Theory and Gravitation (Proc. New Orleans Conference, May 1979), A. R. Marlow, ed. (Academic Press, 1980).

  13. T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang,Phys. Rev. D 12, 3843, 3845 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Penrose, inGeneral Relativity, An Einstein Centenary Survey, S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1979).

  15. H. J. Bernstein,Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 1102 (1967); Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind,Phys. Rev. 158, 1237 (1967); J. S. Dowker,J. Phys. A 2, 267 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. A. Werner, R. Colella, A. W. Overhauser, and C. F. Eagen,Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1053 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Nomizu,Lie Groups and Differential Geometry (Math. Soc. Japan, 1956), p. 15

  18. H. Weyl and R. Brauer,Am. J. Math. 57, 425 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. DeWitt,Dynamical Theories of Groups and Fields (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965), p. 139; R. Kerner,Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré 9, 143 (1968); Y. M. Cho,J. Math. Phys. 16, 2029 (1975); L. N. Chang, K. I. Macrae, and F. Mansouri,Phys. Rev. D 13, 235 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. Bargmann,Ann. Math. 59, 1 (1954), see p. 40; M. Hammermesh,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 9, 518 (1960); J.-M. Levy-Leblond,J. Math. Phys. 4, 776 (1963);Commun. Math. Phys. 4, 157 (1967), see p. 160; F. Gursey, unpublished lectures, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey (1973); P. Roman and J. P. Leveille,J. Math. Phys. 15, 1760 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Anandan and D. D. Coon, unpublished.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work partly supported by the A. W. Mellon Fellowship and NSF grant number PHY-7909281.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anandan, J. On the hypotheses underlying physical geometry. Found Phys 10, 601–629 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00715042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00715042

Keywords

Navigation