Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of some aerodynamic resistance methods using measurements over cotton and grass from the 1991 California ozone deposition experiment

  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurements of dry, deposition velocities (V d ) of O3 (using the eddy correlation technique) made over a cotton field and senescent grass near Fresno California during July and August 1991 were used to test some dry deposition velocity models. Over the cotton field, the observed maximum daytimeV d was about 0.8 cm s−1 and the average nighttime value was about 0.2 cm s−1. Over the grass, daytime values averaged about 0.2 cm s−1 and nighttime values about 0.05 cm s−1. Application of a site-specific model known as ADOM (Acid Deposition and Oxidant Model) over the cotton field generally overestimated the observations except for a few hours in the afternoon when the observations were underestimated The overestimation was attributed to inadequacies in the surface resistance formulation and the underestimation to uncertainties in the aerodynamic formulation. Unlike previous studies which focused on the role of surface resistance, we perform additional tests using a large variety of aerodynamic resistance formulae, in addition to those in ADOM, to determine their influence on the modelledV d of O3 over, cotton. Over grass, ADOM considerably overestimated the observations but showed improvement when other surface resistance formulations were applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Businger, J. A.: 1973, ‘Turbulent Transfer in the Atmospheric Surface Layer”, in D. A. Haugen, (ed.),Workshop in Micrometeorology, pp. 381–392. American Meteorological Society.

  • Byun, D. W.: 1990, “On the Analytical Solutions of Flux-Profile Relationships for the Atmospheric Surface Layer’,J. Appl. Meteorol. 29, 652–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellier, P. and Brunet, Y.: 1992, ‘Flux-gradient Relationships above Tall Plant Canopies’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 58, 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, B. J., Reginato, R. J. and Idso, S. B.: 1986 ‘An Analysis of Infrared Temperature Observations over Wheat and Calculation of Latent Heat Flux’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 37, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, J. L.: 1983, ‘Evapotranspiration Obtained from Remote Sensing Methods’.Adv. Irrig. 2, 395–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffert, M. I. and Storch, J.: 1979, ‘A Scheme for Computing Surface Fluxes from Mean Flow Observations’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 17, 429–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itier, B.: 1980, ‘Une methode simplifiee pur la mesure du flux de chaleur sensible’,J. Rech. Atmos. 14, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, J.: 1979, ‘A Parametric Model of Vertical Eddy Fluxes in the Atmosphere’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 17, 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt, L. and Ek, M.: 1984, ‘The Influence of Atmospheric Stability on Potential Evaporation’,J. Climate Appl. Meterol. 23, 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massman, W. J., Pederson, J., Delany, A., Grantz, D., den Hartog, G., Neumann, H. H., Oncley, S. P., Pearson, R., and Shaw, R.: 1994, ‘An Evaluation of the RADM Surface Module for Ozone Uptake at Three, Sites in the San Joaquin Valley of California’,J. Geophys. Res., In Press.

  • Monteith, J. L.: 1973,Principles of Environmental Physics, Arnold, London, G.B., 241 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padro, J., den Hartog, G., and Neumann, H. H.: 1991, ‘An Investigation of the ADOM Dry Deposition Module Using Summertime O3 Measurements above a Deciduous Forest’Atmos. Envir. 25A, 1689–1704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padro, J., Massman, W. J., den Hartog, G., and Neumann, H. H.: 1994, ‘Dry Deposition Velocity of O3 over a Vineyard Obtained from Models and Observations: The 1991 California Ozone Deposition Experiment’,Water, Air Soil Pollut..68, 325–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Raupach, M. R., Antonia, R. A., and Rajagopalan, S.: 1991, ‘Rought-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers’,Appl. Mech. Rev. 44, 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Riou, C.: 1982, ‘Une expression analytique du flux de chaleur sensible en conditions superadiabatiques a partir de mesures du vent et de la temperature a deux niveaux”,J. Rech. Atmos. 16, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. H. and Paw, U.K. T.: 1992, ‘Observation of Dry Deposition of Ozone in the San Joaquin Valley, FINAL REPORT, Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viney, N. R.: 1991, ‘An Empirical Expression for Aerodynamic Resistance in the Unstable Boundary Layer”,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 56, 381–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesely, M. L.: 1989, ‘Parameterization of Surface Resistances to Gaseous Dry Deposition in Regional-Scale Numerical Models’,Atmos. Environ. 23, 1293–1304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa, J.: 1980, ‘A Re-evaluation of the Kansas Mast Influence on Measurements of Stress and Cup Anemometer Overspeeding’,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 18, 411–430.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padro, J., Massman, W.J., Shaw, R.H. et al. A comparison of some aerodynamic resistance methods using measurements over cotton and grass from the 1991 California ozone deposition experiment. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 71, 327–339 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712174

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712174

Keywords

Navigation