Skip to main content
Log in

Relativity of the metric

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the form of the metric is invariant for arbitrary coordinate transformations, the magnitudes of the elements of the metric are not invariant. For Cartesian coordinates these elements are equal to one and are on the diagonal. Such a unitary metric can also apply to arbitrary coordinates, but only for a coordinate system inhabitant (CSI), to whom these coordinates would appear to be Cartesian. The meaning for a non-Euclidean metric consequently appears to be a simple coordinate system transformation for the appropriate CSI. The conversion of arbitrary coordinates to the flat Cartesian ones can be accomplished by a sequence of isomorphic mappings linking the arbitrary coordinates to the flat Cartesian ones. This is shown for two, three, and four-dimensional spaces. It is also applied to toroidal metrics and fluidfilled spaces for toroidal vortices that are discontinuous, half-wavelength, electromagnetic dipole field distributions. A number of other applications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Kline,Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times (Oxford, 1972).

  2. J. Weber,General Relativity and Gravitational Waves (Interscience, 1961), Chapters 2, 3.

  3. B. Riemann,Nature 1873 (May 1), 14–18, 36–37.

  4. M. Magnus and Oberhettinger,Functions of Mathematical Physics (Chelsea, 1954), pp. 144–159.

  5. P. Moon and R. Spencer,Field Theory Handbook (Springer, 1970).

  6. J. Stratton,Electromagnetic Theory (McGraw-Hill, 1941).

  7. R. Kohl,Selected Writings of Helmholtz (Wesleyan Univ. Press, 1971), pp. 246–265; excerpts in J. Newman,World of Mathematics (Simon and Schuster, 1960), Volume I, pp. 661–666.

  8. H. Poincaré,Science and Hypothesis (Dover, 1952), pp. 51–71.

  9. N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 57, 147 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. M. Honig,Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 19, 108 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. M. Honig,Found. Phys. 4, 367 (1974);Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 18, 44 (1973);Found. Phys. 6, 39 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Klein,Geometry from an Advanced Viewpoint (Dover, 1948).

  13. W. M. Honig,Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 71, 72 (January 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Jammer,Concepts of Space (Harvard Press, 1954).

  15. W. M. Honig,Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 19, 442 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. M. Honig,Int. J. Theor. Phys., forthcoming.

  17. A. Sommerfeld,Mechanics of Deformable Bodies (Academic Press, 1964), p. 14.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Honig, W.M. Relativity of the metric. Found Phys 7, 549–572 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708868

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708868

Keywords

Navigation