We propose a new picture of nature in which there are only two fundamental universal constantsè ē (≡e/c) andh(≡ħ/c). Our theory is developed within the framework of a new four-dimensional symmetry which is constructed on the basis of the Poincaré-Einstein principle of relativity for the laws of physics and the Newtonian concept of time. We obtain a new space-light transformation law, a velocity-addition law, and so on. In this symmetry scheme, the speed of light is constant and is completely relative. The new theory is logically self-consistent, and it moreover is in agreement with all previously established experimental facts, such as the “lifetime dilatation” of unstable particles, the Michelson-Morley experiment, etc. There is a difference relative to the usual theory, though, in that our theory predicts a new law for the Dopplerfrequency shift, which can be tested experimentally by measuring the second-order frequency shift.
KeywordsFrequency Shift Experimental Fact Unstable Particle Usual Theory Symmetry Scheme
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.R. Stoops, ed.,The Quantum Theory of Fields (Interscience, New York, 1962), pp. 37–99.Google Scholar
- 2.P. A. M. Dirac,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 392 (1949);Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A246, 326 (1958); J. P. Hsu,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 75, 479 (1973).Google Scholar
- 3.J. P. Hsu,Phys. Rev. D 5, 981 (1972).Google Scholar
- 4.J. P. Hsu and M. Hongoh,Phys. Rev. D 6, 256 (1972).Google Scholar
- 5.E. U. Condon and H. Odishaw,Handbook of Physics (McGraw-Hill, 1967), pp. 6-158–6-165.Google Scholar
- 6.A. Shadowitz,Special Relativity (W. B. Saunders Co., Toronto, 1968), pp. 157–173; G. C. Babcock and T. G. Bergman,J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 147 (1964); T. A. Filippas and J. G. Fox,Phys. Rev. 135, B1071 (1964); T. Alväger, F. J. M. Farley, J. Kjellman, and I. Wallin,Phys. Lett. 12, 260 (1964).Google Scholar
- 7.H. E. Ives and G. R. Stillwell,J. Opt. Am. Soc. 28, 215 (1938);31, 369 (1941); H. I. Mandelberg and L. Witten,J. Opt. Am. Soc. 52, 529 (1962); see also T. P. Gill,The Doppler Effect (Academic Press, 1965), pp. viii–ix and 140–141.Google Scholar
- 8.H. J. Hay, J. P. Schiffer, T. E. Cranshaw, and P. A. Egelstaff,Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 165 (1960); W. Kundig,Phys. Rev. 129, 2371 (1963).Google Scholar
- 9.J. P. Cedarholm, G. F. Bland, B. L. Havens, and C. H. Towns,Phys. Rev. Lett. 1, 342 (1958).Google Scholar
- 10.H. P. Robertson,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 378 (1949).Google Scholar
- 11.A. P. French,Special Relativity (W. W. Norton and Co., New York, 1968), pp. 72–74.Google Scholar
- 12.R. Resnick,Relativity and Early Quantum Theory (Wiley, New York, 1972), p. 41.Google Scholar