Skip to main content
Log in

The role of position in quantum theory

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper puts forward the proposal to do relativistic quantum theory without a position operator and without a position probability amplitude. The proposed scheme employs space and time in a fundamental manner and treats them equitably as in special relativity by defining the state vectors as functions of configuration spacetime. From a discussion of the conceptual structure and of the problem of measurement of quantum theory, there emerges an understanding which shows that the absence of a satisfactory position probability density in important cases like that of the photon, in the usual scheme of quantum theory, poses a fundamental difficulty, but that the scheme proposed here is free from the same difficulty and promises, instead, to lead in a natural manner to a fundamentally more satisfactory description of the observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Heisenberg,Der Teil und das Ganze (Piper, München, 1969), p. 103, attributed to A. Einstein.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Piron,Foundations of Quantum Physics (Benjamin, Reading, Mass., 1976); J. M. Jauch,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1968); G. Ludwig,Deutung des Begriffs “physikalische Theorie” und axiomatische Grundlegung der Hilbertraumstruktur der Quantenmechanik durch Hauptsätze des Messens (Springer, Berlin, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974); B. d'Espagnat,Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Benjamin, Reading, Mass., 1976); B. d'Espagnat, ed.,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Proc. Int. School of Physics “Enrico Fermi,” Course 49) (Academic Press, New York, 1971); J. Bub,The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974); J. Mehra,The Quantum Principle: Its Interpretation and Epistemology (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974); C. A. Hooker, ed.,Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973); T. Bastin, ed.,Quantum Theory and Beyond (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1955); see also F. London and E. Bauer,La théorie de l'observation en méchanique quantique (Hermann, Paris, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Margenau,The Nature of Physical Reality (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1950);Phil. of Science 30, 138 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Einstein, Geometry and Experience, inReadings in the Philosophy of Science, H. Feigl and M. Brodbeck, eds. (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1953), p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. F. Mott,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 126, 79 (1929); see also L. Schiff,Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968), pp. 335 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Bohr, inAlbert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, P. Schilpp, ed. (Tudor, Evanston, 1949), Vol. 1; N. Bohr,Essays 1958–1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Interscience, New York, 1963), p. 1; W. Heisenberg,Physics and Philosophy (Harper and Row, New York, 1958), p. 44; H. P. Stapp,Am. J. Phys. 40, 1098 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Shimony,Am. J. Phys. 31, 755 (1963); P. K. Feyerabend, inFrontiers of Science and Philosophy, R. G. Colodny, ed. (Pittsburgh, Pa., 1962), Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Laue,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 12, 293 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. L. Park,Phil. Science 35, 205, 389 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. P. Wigner, inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, B. d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Maxwell,Found. Phys. 6, 275 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. L. Park inVistas in Physical Reality, Festschrift for Henry Margenau, E. Laszlo and E. B. Sellon, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1976), pp. 63 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. de Broglie,The Current Interpretation of Wave Mechanics (Elsevier, New York, 1964), p. 4; A. Landé,New Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1965), p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Schrödinger,Naturw. 23, 812 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. P. Wigner,Z. Physik 131, 101 (1952); H. Araki and M. Yanase,Phys. Rev. 120, 666 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Gottfried,Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1966), Vol. 1, Chapter IV.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Kochen and E. P. Specker,J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. P. Wigner,Remarks on the Mind-Body Question, reprinted inSymmetries and Reflections (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970), p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Everett, III,Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. A. Wheeler,Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 463 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Ludwig, inWerner Heisenberg und die Physik unserer Zeit (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1961), p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Hepp,Helv. Phys. Acta 45, 237 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. S. Bell, On Wave Packet Reduction in the Coleman-Hepp Model, CERN preprint, TH 1923 (1974).

  26. M. L. Goldberger and K. M. Watson,Collision Theory (Wiley, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. S. Wightman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 846 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. D. Newton and E. P. Wigner,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 400 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. J. Kálnay, inProblems in the Foundations of Physics, M. Bunge, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. J. Kálnay,Phys. Rev. D 1, 1092 (1970);Phys. Rev. D 3, 2357 (1971); A. J. Kálnay and P. L. Torres,Phys. Rev. D 7, 1707 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  31. W. Pauli,Z. Physik 80, 573 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. O. Barut and S. Malin,Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 632 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  33. B. Gerlach, D. Gromes, and J. Petzold,Z. Physik 202, 401 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  34. V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii,Relativistic Quantum Theory (Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 4, Part 1) (Pergamon, Oxford, 1971), §4.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Y. S. Kim,New Physics (Kor. Phys. Soc.)15, 46 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman,PCT, Spin and Statistics, And All That (Benjamin, New York, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  37. N. N. Bogolubov, A. A. Logunov, and I. T. Todorov,Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory (Benjamin, Reading, Mass., 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. Haag, inLectures on Elementary Particles and Quantum Field Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1970), Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  39. S. Schweber,An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (Row, Peterson & Co., Evanston, 1961), p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Born inNobel Lectures (Physics) 1942–1962 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1964), p. 259; M. Born and P. Jordan,Z. Physik 34, 858 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  41. P. A. M. Dirac,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A109, 642 (1926); see also P. A. M. Dirac,The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1930), or later editions.

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. Lurié,Particles and Fields (Interscience, New York, 1968), Chapter 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by the NRC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laue, H. The role of position in quantum theory. Found Phys 8, 1–30 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708483

Keywords

Navigation