Abstract
The merging of space and time proposed by Minkowski in 1908 is still sometimes misinterpreted as a sort of four-dimensional hyperspace of which time is the fourth dimension, analogous to the other, spatial dimensions. An inevitable consequence of this view is that the future events somehow exist prior to, and independently of, human awareness and that what we call “becoming” is “merely a coming into our awareness” (A. Grünbaum). However, an attentive inspection of the space-time diagram and of Minkowski's formula for the constancy of the world interval shows that the events contained in the absolute future of any frame of reference areintrinsically unobservable not only within this system, but also by any other conceivable observer: consequently, there is no reason to postulate their existence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Williams, “The Myth of Passage,” inJ. Philos. 48, 457 (1951); reprinted inThe Philosophy of Time, ed. by Richard Gale (Anchor Books, New York, 1967), pp. 98–116.
D. Park, “The Myth of Passage of Time,” inThe Study of Time, ed. by J. T. Fraser, F. C. Haber, and G. H. Muller (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1972), pp. 110–121.
W. Quine,Word and Object (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1967), p. 160.
A. Grünbaum,Philosophical Problems of Space and Time (Knopf, New York, 1963), pp. 321–329.
H. Putnam,J. Philos. 64, 240 (1967), esp. p. 246.
E. Meyerson,La déduction relativiste (Paris, 1925), pp. 99–100; M. Čapek, “Einstein and Meyerson on the Status of Becoming in Relativity,” inActes du XIe Congres International d'Histoire des Sciences (Varsovie, 167), I, pp. 131–139.
M. Čapek, “The Myth of Frozen passage,” inBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, II (Humanities Press, New York, 1965), pp. 441–463, esp. pp. 446–448.
C. W. Rietdijk,Phil. Sci. 1968, 23, 341.
H. Reichenbach,The Philosophy of Space and Time (Dover, New York, 1956), p. 149. (Cf. p. 175 of the original German edition,Die Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Berlin, 1928.)
P. Langevin, “Le temps, l'espace et la causalité dans la physique moderne,” inBull. de la société française de philosophie, séance du 19 octobre 1911.
A. Einstein, “Autobiographical Notes,” inAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, ed. by P. A. Schilpp (Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. VII, Evanston, 1949), p. 61.
M. Čapek,Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics, 2nd paperback ed. (Van Nostrand, 1969), Appendix II.
H. Stein,J. Philos. 65, 15 (1968).
A. A. Robb,The Absolute Relations of Space and Time (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1921), pp. 7, 12–13.
H. Bergmann,Der Kampf um das Kausalgesetz in der jungsten Physik (Braunschweig, 1929), p. 15.
H. Margenau,J. Philos. 64, 714 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Čapek, M. Relativity and the status of becoming. Found Phys 5, 607–617 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708432
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708432