Skip to main content
Log in

Bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A retrospective review and analysis of patients referred to the Division of Gastroenterology and the Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery with common bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was undertaken in order to identify injury patterns, management, and outcome. Sixteen patients were identified over a 20-month period. Twelve patients had major common bile duct injuries and four had minor injuries (cystic duct leaks). Seventy-one percent of injuries occurred with surgeons who had done more than 13 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Eighty-three percent of patients who had major ductal injury did not have a cholangiogram prior to the injury. Sixteen percent of patients with major common bile duct injuries had findings of acute cholecystitis and 58% of these major injuries were “easy” gallbladders. One-third of major injuries were recognized at operation. Two-thirds of immediate repairs failed. All cystic duct leaks were managed nonoperatively.

It appears that bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy are more common in the community than is reported. Bile duct complications occur with surgeons who are experienced and inexperienced with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Common bile duct injuries, unrecognized at laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the majority of cases, usually occur with “easy” gallbladders. Operative cholangiography is not utilized in the majority of common bile duct injuries. When immediate repair of common bile duct injuries is undertaken, the majority are unsuccessful. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is invaluable in the diagnosis and management of bile duct complications. Cystic duct leaks may be managed successfully with endoscopic stents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrén-Sandberg A, Johannson S, Bengmark S (1985) Accidental lesions of the common bile duct II. Results of treatment. Ann Surg 201: 452–455

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey RW, Zucker KA, Flowers JL, Scovill WA, Graham SM, Imbembo AL (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 214: 531–40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baird DR, Wilson JP, Mason EM, Duncan TP, Evans JS, Luke JP, Ruben DM, Lucas GW (1992) An early review of 800 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at a university-affiliated community teaching hospital. Am Surg 58: 206–210

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl H (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, Hilleren DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, Newman GE, Cotton PB, Meyers WC (1992) Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215: 196–202

    Google Scholar 

  6. Easter DW, Moossa AR (1991) Laser and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a hazardous union? Arch Surg 126: 423

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hermann RE (1976) A plea for a safer technique of cholecystectomy. Surgery 79: 609–611

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter JG (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162: 71–75

    Google Scholar 

  9. Larson GM, Vitale GC, Casey J, Evans JS, Gilliam G, Heuser L, McGee G, Rao M, Scherm MJ, Voyles RC (1992) Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients. Am J Surg 163: 221–226

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moossa AR, Easter DW, Van Sonnenberg E, Casola G, D'Agostino H (1992) Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. Ann Surg 215: 203–205

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Inners JT, Liss JL, Nichols KE, Lomano JM, Roby SR, Front ME, Carey LC (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 213: 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pitt HA, Miyamoto T, Parapatis SK, Tompkins RK, Longmire WP (1983). Factors influencing outcome in patients with postoperative biliary strictures. Am J Surg 144: 14–21

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosato FE, Berkowitz HD, Roberts B (1970) Bile ascites. Surg Gynecol Obstet 130: 494–496

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sackier JM, Berci G, Phillips E, Carroll B, Shapiro S, Paz-Partlow MC (1991) The role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 126: 1021–1026

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schirmer BD, Edge SB, Dix J, Hyser MJ, Hanks JB, Jones RS (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg 213: 665–677

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324: 1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  17. Voyles CR, Petro AB, Meena AL, Haick AJ, Koury AM (1991) A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy 161: 365–370

  18. Way LW, Bernhoft RA, Thomas MJ (1981) Biliary stricture. Surg Clin North Am 61: 963–972

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson P, Leese T, Morgan WP, Kelly JF, Brigg JK (1991) Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for “all-comers.” Lancet 338: 789–790

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wolfe BM, Gardiner BN, Leary BF, Frey CF (1991) Endoscopic cholecystectomy. An analysis of complications. Arch Surg 126: 1192–1198

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zucker KA, Bailey RW, Gadacz TR, Imbembo AL (1991) Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 36–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, D.B., Borowicz, M.R., Taylor Wootton, F. et al. Bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7, 79–83 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704382

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704382

Key words

Navigation