Advertisement

Chemistry of Natural Compounds

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 244–246 | Cite as

The thin-layer chromatography of dinucleotides

  • K. A. Averburg
  • E. N. Morozova
  • N. S. Tikhomirova-Sidorova
Article
  • 44 Downloads

Conclusions

1. The chromatographic behavior of the dinucleotides of an RNA hydrolysate in thin layers of ECTEOLA- and DEAE-cellulose and on a cellulose powder has been studied. The Rf values of the four dinucleotides ApCp, ApUp,GpCp andGpUp in various solvent systems have been determined. It has been shown that in a thin layer of DEAE cellulose the dinucleotide fraction of a ribonuclease hydrolysate is separated into the four individual components.

2. Conditions for the separation of authentic mixtures of dinucleotides and of mixtures of mono- and dinucleotides have been found.

Keywords

Cellulose Dinucleotide HCOOH Ammonium Formate Chromatographic Behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Markham and A. J. D. Smith, Biochem. J.,49, 401, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. W. Rushizsky and C. A. Knight, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., US,46, 945, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. N. Davidson and A. R. Smellie, Biochem. J.,52, 599, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. E. Cohn, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,72, 1471, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. E. Cohn and E. Volkin, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,24, 359, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Randerath, Dünschichtchromatography, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1962.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. A. Dyer, J. Chromatog.,11, 414, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. L. Starr and B. Ramberg, Nature,211, 414, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Ratapongs, Naturw.,53, 251, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Hiby and H. Kröger, J. Chromatog.,26, 545, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. R. Björk and J. Svensson, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,138, 430, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Lando, J. De Rudder, and M. P. De Garilhe, J. Chromatog.,30, 143, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. V. Tomlinson and G. M. Tener, Biochem.,2, 697, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. D. Aksel'rod, T. V. Venkstern, and A. A. Baev, Biokihm.,30, 999, 1965.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. S. Panteleeva, Vestn. LGU, biol. ser., no. 9, 73, 1964.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. S. Tolmacheva and L. N. Nikolenko, ZhAKh,22, 298, 1967.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Grippo, M. Faccarino, M. Rossi, and E. Scarano, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,95, 1, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. I. Khabarova and S. M. Zhenodarova, KhPS [Chemistry of Natural Compounds],2, 48, 1966.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Randerath, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,61, 852, 1962.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Banderath, J. Chromatog.,16, 111, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Barber, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,114, 422, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. V. Nikolaeva, L. P. Semenova, and K. E. Kruglyakova, DAN SSSR,169, 1203, 1966.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. A. Averburg
    • 1
  • E. N. Morozova
    • 1
  • N. S. Tikhomirova-Sidorova
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of High-Molecular-Weight Compounds AS USSRUSSR

Personalised recommendations