Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental evaluations of substrate types as barriers to sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus spp.) movement

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Descriptive evidence that sandy surfaces and rock ledges inhibit progress of grazing sea urchins prompted an experimental investigation of physical obstacles to urchin movement in a subtidal area of reef and kelp off southern California in 1980. In laboratory experiments, we found that both red (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) and purple (S. purpuratus) urchins can negotiate sand using their oral spines, although purple urchins are slower and more hesitant to do so. In field experiments, we observed the fates of starved red urchins transported to replicate plots within stands of sand-or rock-based understory kelp (Pterygophora californica). Urchins in rock plots retreated to nearby crevices from where they ate attached kelp. After finding kelp blades, urchins soon disappeared from sand plots because individuals in small groups may have difficulty holding and eating attached kelps on unconsolidated surfaces. In another experiment, red and purple urchins reached kelp on a rock ledge by mounting an artificial ramp. We conclude that by using their tube feet, individuals of both species move best over flat, hard surfaces, although soft substrate may constitute a major barrier only to purple urchins. In the absence of effective predator control, urchins can surmount most sand or rock barriers when water motion subsides. Hence, their ability to coordinate spine movements to negotiate soft substrates may be an adaptation to invade kelp refuges during quiet periods if preferred drift food is unavailable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Bennett, J. and A. C. Giese: The annual reproductive and nutritional cycles in two western sea urchins. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 109, 226–237 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. B., B. E. Williams and K. H. Mann: The role of behavioral responses to predators in modifying urchins' (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) destructive grazing and seasonal foraging patterns. Mar. Biol. 63, 39–49 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, P. A.: Relations among lobster, sea urchins and kelp in Nova Scotia. In: Proceedings of the workshop on the relationship between sea urchin grazing and commercial plant/animal harvesting, pp 24–32. Ed. by J. D. Pringle, G. J. Sharp and J. F. Caddy. Halifax: 1980. (Tech Rep. Fish. aquat Sciences Can. 954, 1–273)

  • Breen, P. A. and K. H. Mann: Destructive grazing of kelp by sea urchins in Eastern Canada. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33, 1278–1283 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. R. O.: Stability of sea urchin dominated barren grounds following destructive grazing of kelp in St. Margaret's Bay, eastern Canada. Mar. Biol. 62, 307–311 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P. K.: Ecology of kelp communities. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 215–245 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, T. A., S. C. Schroeter and J. D. Dixon: Effects of grazing by two species of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and Lytechinus anamesus) on recruitment and survival of two species of kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera and Pterygophora californica). Mar. Biol. 78, 301–313 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggins, D. O.: Interspecific facilitation in a guild of benthic marine herbivores. Oecologia 48, 157–163 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, A. W., D. R. Laur and R. J. Rowley: Severe storm disturbance and reversal of community structure in a southern California kelp forest. Mar. Biol. 84, 287–294 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, J. A., N. S. Smith and J. F. Palmisano: Sea otter predation and community organization in the western Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Ecology 59, 822–833 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. S. and D. R. Schiel: The ecology of giant kelp forests in California: a community profile. Rep. Dir. Fish Wildl. Serv. (Biol. Rep.). 85, 1–152 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuji, A.: Ecological studies on the growth and food consumption of Japanese common littoral sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus intermedius (A. Agassiz). Mem. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ. 15, 83–160 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrold, C. and D. C. Reed: Food availability, sea urchin grazing and kelp forest community structure. Ecology 66, 1160–1169 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelman, J. H., Y. Lavergne, F. Axelson, A. Cardinal and E. Bourget: Sea urchins in the Saint Lawrence Estuary: their abundance, size-structure, and suitability for commercial exploitation. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 40, 474–486 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laur, D. R., A. W. Ebeling and D. Coon: Effects of sea otter foraging in subtidal communities of the central California coast. In: The influence of sea otters on the nearshore marine ecosystem in the North Pacific, Ed. by G. R. VanBlaricom and J. A. Estes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (In press)

  • Leighton, D. L.: Studies of food preferences in algivorous invertebrates of southern California kelp beds. Pacif. Sci. 20, 104–113 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, D. L.: Grazing activities of benthic invertebrates in southern California kelp beds. Nova Hedwigia 32, 421–453 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissner, A. L.: Some effects of turbulence on the activity of the sea urchin Centrostephanus coronatus. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 48, 185–193 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, K. H., J. L. C. Wright, B. E. Welsford and E. Hatfield: Responses of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (O. F. Müller) to water-borne stimuli from potential predators and potential food items. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 79, 233–244 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. J.: Succession in sea urchin and seaweed abundance in Nova Scotia. Canada. Mar. Biol. 84, 275–286 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, J. S.: Reproductive periodicities of Indo-Pacific invertebrates in the Gulf of Suez. II. The echinoid Echinometra mathaei (De Blainville). Bull. mar. Sci. 9, 580–613 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, J. S.: Synchronization of gametogenesis in the sea urchins Strongylocentrotus purpuratus and S. franciscanus. In: Advances in invertebrate reproduction, pp 53–68. Ed. by W. H. Clark, Jr. and T. S. Adams. New York: Elsevier North-Holland (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, J. S., M. E. Clark, D. L. Leighton, C. T. Mitchell and W. J. North: Marine waste disposal and sea urchin ecology, In: Kelp habitat improvement project, annual reprot, 1969–1970, pp 45–68. Ed. by W. J. North. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiel, D. R.: Selective feeding by the echinoid, Evechinus chloroticus, and the removal of plants from subtidal algal stands in northern New Zealand. Oecologia 54, 379–388 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiel, D. R. and M. S. Foster: The structure of subtidal algal stands in temperate waters. Oceanogr. mar. Biol. A. Rev. (In press) (1986)

  • Schroeter, S. C.: Experimental studies of competition as a factor affecting the distribution and abundance of purple sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Stimpson), 184 pp. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Santa Barbara 1978

  • Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf: Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd ed. 859 pp. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co. 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegner, M. J. and L. A. Levin: Do sea urchins and abalones compete in California kelp forest communities? In: Echinoderms: Proceedings of International Conference, Tampa Bay, pp 265–271. Ed. by J. M. Lawrence Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas, R. L., R. W. Elner, P. E. Garwood and I. G. Babb: Experimental evaluation of aggregation behavior in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. A reinterpretation. Mar. Biol. 90, 433–448 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by R. S. Carney, Baton Rouge

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laur, D.R., Ebeling, A.W. & Reed, D.C. Experimental evaluations of substrate types as barriers to sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus spp.) movement. Mar. Biol. 93, 209–215 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00508258

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00508258

Keywords

Navigation